The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The architecture of the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall
Open accessAbstract
The primary structural component of the bacterial cell wall is peptidoglycan, which is essential for viability and the synthesis of which is the target for crucial antibiotics1,2. Peptidoglycan is a single macromolecule made of glycan chains crosslinked by peptide side branches that surrounds the cell, acting as a constraint to internal turgor1,3. In Gram-positive bacteria, peptidoglycan is tens of nanometres thick, generally portrayed as a homogeneous structure that provides mechanical strength4–6. Here we applied atomic force microscopy7–12 to interrogate the morphologically distinct Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis species, using live cells and purified peptidoglycan. The mature surface of live cells is characterized by a landscape of large (up to 60 nm in diameter), deep (up to 23 nm) pores constituting a disordered gel of peptidoglycan. The inner peptidoglycan surface, consisting of more nascent material, is much denser, with glycan strand spacing typically less than 7 nm. The inner surface architecture is location dependent; the cylinder of B. subtilis has dense circumferential orientation, while in S. aureus and division septa for both species, peptidoglycan is dense but randomly oriented. Revealing the molecular architecture of the cell envelope frames our understanding of its mechanical properties and role as the environmental interface13,14, providing information complementary to traditional structural biology approaches. Using high-resolution atomic force microscopy of live cells, the authors present an updated view of the cell walls of both Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
Cited by
Teymouri, S., Yousefi, M. H., Heidari, S., Farokhi, S., Afkhami, H., & Kashfi, M. (2025) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-024-10163-x · Cited by 11
Molecular mechanism of bacteriophage contraction structure of an S-layer–penetrating bacteriophage
Wilson, J. S., Fortier, L.-C., Fagan, R. P., & Bullough, P. A. (2025) · Life Science Alliance · doi:10.26508/lsa.202403088 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pasquina-Lemonche, L., Burns, J., Turner, R. D., Kumar, S., Tank, R., Mullin, N., Wilson, J. S., Chakrabarti, B., Bullough, P. A., Foster, S. J., & Hobbs, J. K.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-04-29
- Volume
- 582
- Issue
- 7811
- Pages
- 294-297
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3022315945
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The architecture of the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-020-2236-6
- The paper
- Pasquina-Lemonche, L., Burns, J., Turner, R. D., Kumar, S., Tank, R., Mullin, N., Wilson, J. S., Chakrabarti, B., Bullough, P. A., Foster, S. J., & Hobbs, J. K. (2020). The architecture of the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2236-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.