The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour
Open accessAbstract
Substantial research over the past two decades has established that extracellular matrix (ECM) elasticity, or stiffness, affects fundamental cellular processes, including spreading, growth, proliferation, migration, differentiation and organoid formation. Linearly elastic polyacrylamide hydrogels and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomers coated with ECM proteins are widely used to assess the role of stiffness, and results from such experiments are often assumed to reproduce the effect of the mechanical environment experienced by cells in vivo. However, tissues and ECMs are not linearly elastic materials-they exhibit far more complex mechanical behaviours, including viscoelasticity (a time-dependent response to loading or deformation), as well as mechanical plasticity and nonlinear elasticity. Here we review the complex mechanical behaviours of tissues and ECMs, discuss the effect of ECM viscoelasticity on cells, and describe the potential use of viscoelastic biomaterials in regenerative medicine. Recent work has revealed that matrix viscoelasticity regulates these same fundamental cell processes, and can promote behaviours that are not observed with elastic hydrogels in both two- and three-dimensional culture microenvironments. These findings have provided insights into cell-matrix interactions and how these interactions differentially modulate mechano-sensitive molecular pathways in cells. Moreover, these results suggest design guidelines for the next generation of biomaterials, with the goal of matching tissue and ECM mechanics for in vitro tissue models and applications in regenerative medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, other matrices with defined compositions64 have been explored as alternative matrices to Matrigel, such as recombinant human collagen62, fibrin65, or synthetic hydrogels3,63.”
From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Biological tissues are viscoelastic, which means that their mechanical behavior can be described as that of both a solid (elastic) and a liquid (viscous) [21,22,23].”
From Fascia Mobility, Proprioception, and Myofascial Pain. (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“dECM hydrogels are biomaterials that predominantly rely on the self-assembly process of collagen fibers, which can be regulated by glycosaminoglycans and other ECM proteins.”
From Constructing biomimetic microenvironments for liver regeneration (2025) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“The viscoelastic properties of a material affect matrix remodeling, cell spreading, migration, differentiation, and consequently, organoid fate139–141.”
From Towards organoid culture without Matrigel (2021) · cites this paper as [140]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–205 of 205
Distance as a Factor in the Development of Attraction Fields between Growing Tissues in Culture
Katzberg, A. A. (1951) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.114.2965.431 · Cited by 20
Extending a Spectrin Repeat Unit. II: Rupture Behavior
Paramore, S., Ayton, G. S., & Voth, G. A. (2005) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.066977 · Cited by 19
Connizzo, B. K., & Grodzinsky, A. J. (2017) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4038745 · Cited by 16
Organotypic Neurovascular Models: Past Results and Future Directions
Balikov, D. A., Neal, E. H., & Lippmann, E. S. (2019) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2019.09.010 · Cited by 15
Surface tension determines tissue shape and growth kineticsPreprint
Ehrig, S., Bidan, C. M., West, A., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/456228 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Suki, B. & Lutchen, K. R. in Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering (Wiley, 2006).
- Cowin, S. C., Van Buskirk, W. C. & Ashman, R. B. in Handbook of Bioengineering (McGraw-Hill, 1987).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hofer, M., & Lutolf, M. P. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00279-y · Cited by 1,184
Zhao, Z., Chen, X., Dowbaj, A. M., Sljukic, A., Bratlie, K., Lin, L., Fong, E. L. S., Balachander, G. M., Chen, Z., Soragni, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00174-y · Cited by 1,082
Towards organoid culture without Matrigel
Kozlowski, M. T., Crook, C. J., & Ku, H. T. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02910-8 · Cited by 409
Modulating extracellular matrix stiffness: A strategic approach to boost cancer immunotherapy
Mai, Z., Lin, Y., Lin, P., Zhao, X., & Cui, L. (2024) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-024-06697-4 · Cited by 398
Liu, S., Yu, J.-M., Gan, Y.-C., Qiu, X.-Z., Gao, Z.-C., Wang, H., Chen, S.-X., Xiong, Y., Liu, G.-H., Lin, S.-E., et al. (2023) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-023-00448-w · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaudhuri, O., Cooper-White, J., Janmey, P. A., Mooney, D. J., & Shenoy, V. B.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chaudhuri, Ovijit
- Cooper-White, Justin
- Janmey, Paul A.
- Mooney, David J.
- Shenoy, Vivek B.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-08-26
- Volume
- 584
- Issue
- 7822
- Pages
- 535-546
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC7676152
- OpenAlex
- W3080362910
- Cited by
- 2,224
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 356 · 2025: 494 · 2024: 423 · 2023: 376 · 2022: 324 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 27.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (EB017753)
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA193417, U01CA214369, R01CA232256, R37CA214136, U01CA202177)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM136259)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB017753)
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE013033)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Keywords
- extracellular matrix stiffness, cell-matrix interactions, polyacrylamide hydrogel, PDMS elastomer, nonlinear elasticity, cell migration, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, organoid formation, regenerative medicine, in vitro tissue models, 3D cell culture
- MeSH terms
- Biocompatible Materials, Elasticity, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Models, Biological, Cell Culture Techniques, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Regenerative Medicine, Cell Shape, Viscoelastic Substances, Mesenchymal Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review