The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence
Open accessAbstract
Technologies that rely on quantum bits (qubits) require long coherence times and high-fidelity operations 1. Superconducting qubits are one of the leading platforms for achieving these objectives 2,3. However, the coherence of superconducting qubits is affected by the breaking of Cooper pairs of electrons 4-6. The experimentally observed density of the broken Cooper pairs, referred to as quasiparticles, is orders of magnitude higher than the value predicted at equilibrium by the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory of superconductivity 7-9. Previous work 10-12 has shown that infrared photons considerably increase the quasiparticle density, yet even in the best-isolated systems, it remains much higher 10 than expected, suggesting that another generation mechanism exists 13. Here we provide evidence that ionizing radiation from environmental radioactive materials and cosmic rays contributes to this observed difference. The effect of ionizing radiation leads to an elevated quasiparticle density, which we predict would ultimately limit the coherence times of superconducting qubits of the type measured here to milliseconds. We further demonstrate that radiation shielding reduces the flux of ionizing radiation and thereby increases the energy-relaxation time. Albeit a small effect for today's qubits, reducing or mitigating the impact of ionizing radiation will be critical for realizing fault-tolerant superconducting quantum computers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This timescale is long compared to the typical qubit coherence times, and therefore will have a limited in uence on typical qubit T 1 measurements [4].”
From Resolving catastrophic error bursts from cosmic rays in large arrays of superconducting qubits (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Araujo, H., Arce, P., Asai, M., Axen, D., Banerjee, S., Barrand, G., et al. (2003) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 · Cited by 25,106
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720
Tanabashi, M., Hagiwara, K., Hikasa, K., Nakamura, K., Sumino, Y., Takahashi, F., Tanaka, J., Agashe, K., Aielli, G., Amsler, C., et al. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.030001 · Cited by 7,177
Geant4 developments and applications
Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Araujo, H., Arce Dubois, P., Asai, M., Barrand, G., Capra, R., Chauvie, S., Chytracek, R., et al. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · doi:10.1109/tns.2006.869826 · Cited by 6,946
Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box
Koch, J., Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A. A., Schuster, D. I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 · Cited by 3,351
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19718 · Cited by 2,386
A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits
Krantz, P., Kjærgaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5089550 · Cited by 2,321
Self-citationSuperconducting Qubits: Current State of Play
Kjaergaard, M., Schwartz, M. E., Braumüller, J., Krantz, P., Wang, J. I.-J., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2020) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605 · Cited by 1,544
Self-citationA broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays
Day, P. K., LeDuc, H. G., Mazin, B. A., Vayonakis, A., & Zmuidzinas, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02037 · Cited by 1,386
Search for Majorana Neutrinos Near the Inverted Mass Hierarchy Region with KamLAND-Zen
Gando, A., Gando, Y., Hachiya, T., Hayashi, A., Hayashida, S., Ikeda, H., Inoue, K., Ishidoshiro, K., Karino, Y., Koga, M., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.082503 · Cited by 977
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hagmann, C., Lange, D. & Wright, D. Cosmic-ray shower generator (CRY) for Monte Carlo transport codes. IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec. 2, 1143–1146 (2007).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–231 of 231
Electron-phonon interactions in the Andreev bound states of aluminum nanobridge Josephson junctions
Farmer, J. T., Zarassi, A., Shanto, S., Hartsell, D. M., & Levenson-Falk, E. M. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.l140506
Quantum information science and underground facilities
Formaggio, J. A. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0161833
Self-citationAn intersection of radiation detection and superconducting electronics
Hall, J. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0161836
Finite‐Frequency Noise and Dynamical Charge Susceptibility in Single and Double Quantum Dot Systems
Richard, S., Lavagna, M., & Adeline Crépieux, C. (2023) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202300345
Sarica, U. (2023) · Journal of Instrumentation · doi:10.1088/1748-0221/18/12/p12005
Quantum sensing using a qubit for the detection of ionizing radiation
Freeman, M., Ramos, S. D. C. S., Lewis, R., & Carr, S. M. (2024) · Hard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Neutron Detector Physics · doi:10.1117/12.3029915
Evaluating the Impact of Single Event Effect Duration on Quantum Circuits
Pesegoginski, M., Gobatto, L. R., Kastensmidt, F. L., & Azambuja, J. R. (2025) · IEEE Latin American Symposium on Circuits and Systems (LASCAS) · doi:10.1109/lascas64004.2025.10966317
Reiss, Y., & Schechter, M. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.l201403 · Cited by 1
High-purity tungsten produced via chemical vapor deposition for use in low-background detectors
di Vacri, M. L., Fortini, A., Schlieder, T. D., Hobbs, K. P., Arnquist, I. J., Hoppe, E. W., & Hughes, D. (2025) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.171018
Seismometry of radiation-induced quasiparticle bursts in superconducting devices
Valenti, F., Murani, A., Paluch, P., Gartmann, R., Scheller, L., Gebauer, R., Kruk, R., Reisinger, T. J. G., Ardila-Perez, L. E., & Pop, I. M. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/xmyw-yc9h
Modeling and benchmarking quantum optical neurons for efficient neural computation
Andrisani, A., Vessio, G., Sgobba, F., Lena, F. D., Amato, L. S., & Castellano, G. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0341545
Novel light dark matter detection with a quantum parity detector using qubit arrays
Li, X., Liu, Y., Shu, J., Song, N., Song, Y., Wang, J., Wu, Y.-L., Zhang, T., & Zhou, Y.-F. (2026) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/wr37-kjmb
Gurra, E., Bennett, D. A., Duff, S. M., Vissers, M. R., & Ullom, J. N. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/v181-yd74 · Cited by 3
SQUID G.A.M.E.: Gamma, Atmospheric, and Mono-Energetic Neutron Effects on Quantum Devices
Casagranda, G., Auden, E. C., Cazzaniga, C., Kastriotou, M., Frost, C. D., Vallero, M., Vella, F., & Rech, P. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · doi:10.1109/tns.2026.3657307
Decay-resolved charge changes from radioactive decays in levitated microparticles
Wang, J., Penny, T. W., Tseng, Y.-H., Siegel, B., & Moore, D. C. (2026) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/z83g-y4xn
Effect of the Environment on Fluxonium Qubits and Thermodynamics of Quantum Measurement
Stevens, J. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/45412444z86eaz418fzabfaz7d4012e9145b
Effect of gamma radiation on low kinetic inductance superconducting microwave resonators
Thobaben, N. J., Zheng, K., Osmon, G. A., Sohm, A. E., Cherry, D. T., Kowsari, D., Zhao, X., Murch, K. W., Cooper, R. L., Goodman, K. D., et al. (2026) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0305040
Oh, S.-H., Cha, J., Chong, Y., & Lee, E. (2026) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2026.117005
Multiple quasiparticle bound states in a local superconducting gap variation
Morin, R., Basko, D. M., Houzet, M., & Meyer, J. S. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/xfd7-yl65 · Cited by 1
Intrinsic quasiparticle lifetime in superconducting aluminum
Norowski, K., Foltyn, M., Savin, A. M., & Zgirski, M. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/wsqx-9bgf
Hamiltonian formulation of field–transmission line coupling and its classical–quantum correspondence
Hosseinzadeh, S. (2026) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0325516
Quasiparticle-induced decoherence of a driven superconducting qubit
Anonymous, Kurilovich, P. D., Klots, A. R., Connolly, T., Aleǐner, I. L., & Kurilovich, V. D. (2026) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/3q5z-tk7c · Cited by 5
Advances in Quantum Materials for Therapeutic Applications
Mahata, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19536-4_12
Wang, S.-Y., Wang, D.-S., Yu, X.-H., Zhao, B., Wang, W.-L., Hui-hui, S., Wang, L., Liu, F.-D., Qi, X.-Y., & Shan, Z. (2026) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00527-6
Two-Tooth Bosonic Quantum Comb for Temporal-Correlation Sensing
Anonymous, You, X., Romanenko, A., & Grassellino, A. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/6738-xcgc
In Situ Benchmarking of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits: Clifford Circuits
Anonymous, Hangleiter, D., Bluvstein, D., Lukin, M. D., & Gullans, M. J. (2026) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/ghn4-8y96 · Cited by 11
Superconducting-qubit decoherence correlated with detected radiation events
Anonymous, Beck, K. M., Alegria, L. D., Martinez, L. A., Chaves, K., O’Kelley, S. R., Materise, N., DuBois, J. L., & Rosen, Y. J. (2026) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/ddyy-t37l · Cited by 1
Li, X., Liu, R., Zhou, Y., Wang, G., Cao, L., & Xiong, Y.-C. (2026) · Modern Physics Letters B · doi:10.1142/s0217984926502131
Steane [[7,1,3]] outer coding for loss-tolerant one-way quantum repeaters
Bihan, S. Z., Choudhury, A. K., & Choudhury, S. M. (2026) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-026-05327-6
Impact of terrestrial cosmic radiation on modern information processing: from transistors to qubits
Alberton, S. G. P. N., Vilas-Bôas, A. C., Aguiar, V. A. P., Federico, C. A., & Rouxinol, F. P. M. (2026) · Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices · doi:10.1109/sbmicro70495.2026.11684451
Quantum Computing in Space: Engineering Challenges, Fundamental Limits, and Perspectives
Memon, Q. A. (2026) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum8040105
Metadata
- Authors
- Vepsäläinen, A. P., Karamlou, A. H., Orrell, J. L., Dogra, A. S., Loer, B., Vasconcelos, F., Kim, D. K., Melville, A. J., Niedzielski, B. M., Yoder, J. L., Gustavsson, S., Formaggio, J. A., VanDevender, B. A., & Oliver, W. D.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vepsäläinen, Antti P.
- Orrell, John L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-08-26
- Volume
- 584
- Issue
- 7822
- Pages
- 551-556
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3080931191
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2020-09-12)
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (FA8721-05-C-0002, 1720311)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0019295, #FA8721-05-C-0002)
- Battelle
- Nuclear Physics
- Army Research Office (W911NF1810218, W911NF-14-1, W911NF-141-0682, W911NF)
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Superconducting and THz Device Technology
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Keywords
- superconducting qubits, qubit coherence, ionizing radiation, quasiparticle density, Cooper pair breaking, cosmic rays, environmental radioactivity, radiation shielding, energy relaxation time, superconducting quantum computing, fault-tolerant quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
