Cited by 183Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenetic factors in colorectal cancerAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research

A body map of somatic mutagenesis in morphologically normal human tissues

Li, Ruoyan, Di, Lin, Li, Jie, Fan, Wenyi, Liu, Yachen, Guo, Wenjia, Liu, Weiling, Liu, Lu +13 more·2021·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Somatic mutations that accumulate in normal tissues are associated with ageing and disease 1,2 . Here we performed a comprehensive genomic analysis of 1,737 morphologically normal tissue biopsies of 9 organs from 5 donors. We found that somatic mutation accumulations and clonal expansions were widespread, although to variable extents, in morphologically normal human tissues. Somatic copy number alterations were rarely detected, except for in tissues from the oesophagus and cardia. Endogenous mutational processes with the SBS1 and SBS5 mutational signatures are ubiquitous among normal tissues, although they exhibit different relative activities. Exogenous mutational processes operate in multiple tissues from the same donor. We reconstructed the spatial somatic clonal architecture with sub-millimetre resolution. In the oesophagus and cardia, macroscopic somatic clones that expanded to hundreds of micrometres were frequently seen, whereas in tissues such as the colon, rectum and duodenum, somatic clones were microscopic in size and evolved independently, possibly restricted by local tissue microstructures. Our study depicts a body map of somatic mutations and clonal expansions from the same individual.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-021-03836-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 183

Authors
Li, R., Di, L., Li, J., Fan, W., Liu, Y., Guo, W., Liu, W., Liu, L., Li, Q., Chen, L., Chen, Y., Miao, C., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Xu, D., Lin, D., Huang, Y., Wang, J., Bai, F., & Wu, C.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Center for Life Sciences (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Lin, Dongxin
  • Huang, Yanyi
  • Wang, Jianbin
  • Bai, Fan
  • Wu, Chen
Venue
Nature
Published
2021-08-25
Volume
597
Issue
7876
Pages
398-403
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3195965567
Cited by
183
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 9
FWCI
13.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Keywords
somatic mutations, mutational signatures, somatic copy number alterations, normal human tissues, esophagus, gastric cardia, colon, rectum, duodenum, aging, mutational burden, laser capture microdissection
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Cadaver, Cardia, Clone Cells, Esophagus, Female, Health, Humans, Male, Mutation, Organ Specificity, Mutagenesis, Genomics, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review