Cited by 211RNA Research and SplicingProtein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Nucleation landscape of biomolecular condensates

Open access
Shimobayashi, Shunsuke F., Ronceray, Pierre, Sanders, David W., Haataja, Mikko P., Brangwynne, Clifford P.·2021·Nature

Abstract

All structures within living cells must form at the right time and place. This includes condensates such as the nucleolus, Cajal bodies and stress granules, which form via liquid-liquid phase separation of biomolecules, particularly proteins enriched in intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) 1,2 . In non-living systems, the initial stages of nucleated phase separation arise when thermal fluctuations overcome an energy barrier due to surface tension. This phenomenon can be modelled by classical nucleation theory (CNT), which describes how the rate of droplet nucleation depends on the degree of supersaturation, whereas the location at which droplets appear is controlled by interfacial heterogeneities 3,4 . However, it remains unknown whether this framework applies in living cells, owing to the multicomponent and highly complex nature of the intracellular environment, including the presence of diverse IDRs, whose specificity of biomolecular interactions is unclear 5-8 . Here we show that despite this complexity, nucleation in living cells occurs through a physical process similar to that in inanimate materials, but the efficacy of nucleation sites can be tuned by their biomolecular features. By quantitatively characterizing the nucleation kinetics of endogenous and biomimetic condensates in living cells, we find that key features of condensate nucleation can be quantitatively understood through a CNT-like theoretical framework. Nucleation rates can be substantially enhanced by…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-021-03905-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shimobayashi, S. F., Ronceray, P., Sanders, D. W., Haataja, M. P., & Brangwynne, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
2021-09-22
Volume
599
Issue
7885
Pages
503-506
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3201539595
Cited by
211
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 5
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CONV-0001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
biomolecular condensates, liquid-liquid phase separation, classical nucleation theory, nucleation kinetics, intrinsically disordered regions, nucleolus, Cajal bodies, stress granules, nucleation sites, synthetic condensates
MeSH terms
Biomolecular Condensates, Female, Humans, Kinetics, Thermodynamics, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review