Prefrontal feature representations drive memory recall
Open accessAbstract
Memory formation involves binding of contextual features into a unitary representation 1-4, whereas memory recall can occur using partial combinations of these contextual features. The neural basis underlying the relationship between a contextual memory and its constituent features is not well understood; in particular, where features are represented in the brain and how they drive recall. Here, to gain insight into this question, we developed a behavioural task in which mice use features to recall an associated contextual memory. We performed longitudinal imaging in hippocampus as mice performed this task and identified robust representations of global context but not of individual features. To identify putative brain regions that provide feature inputs to hippocampus, we inhibited cortical afferents while imaging hippocampus during behaviour. We found that whereas inhibition of entorhinal cortex led to broad silencing of hippocampus, inhibition of prefrontal anterior cingulate led to a highly specific silencing of context neurons and deficits in feature-based recall. We next developed a preparation for simultaneous imaging of anterior cingulate and hippocampus during behaviour, which revealed robust population-level representation of features in anterior cingulate, that lag hippocampus context representations during training but dynamically reorganize to lead and target recruitment of context ensembles in hippocampus during recall. Together, we provide the first mechanistic insights into where contextual features are represented in the brain, how they emerge, and how they access long-range episodic representations to drive memory recall.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anticipatory licking during the CS-trace provides a reliable, trial-by-trial index of memory expression.
“in which anticipatory licking provides a reliable, trial-by-trial index of memory expression.”
From Infraslow histaminergic dynamics govern priming states to gate moment-to-moment memory accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]O’Keefe J & Nadel L The hippocampus as a cognitive map. (Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1978).
- Authors
- Yadav, N., Noble, C., Niemeyer, J. E., Terceros, A., Victor, J., Liston, C., & Rajasethupathy, P.
- Affiliations
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rajasethupathy, Priyamvada
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2022-07-13
- Volume
- 608
- Issue
- 7921
- Pages
- 153-160
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC9577479
- OpenAlex
- W4285086629
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH123154, R00MH109652, R01MH118451)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- memory retrieval, contextual memory, feature representation, hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, entorhinal cortex, cortical afferents, episodic memory, population coding
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Gyrus Cinguli, Hippocampus, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Neurological, Neural Inhibition, Mental Recall, Entorhinal Cortex, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review