Antibody targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases for receptor degradation
Open accessAbstract
Most current therapies that target plasma membrane receptors function by antagonizing ligand binding or enzymatic activities. However, typical mammalian proteins comprise multiple domains that execute discrete but coordinated activities. Thus, inhibition of one domain often incompletely suppresses the function of a protein. Indeed, targeted protein degradation technologies, including proteolysis-targeting chimeras 1 (PROTACs), have highlighted clinically important advantages of target degradation over inhibition 2 . However, the generation of heterobifunctional compounds binding to two targets with high affinity is complex, particularly when oral bioavailability is required 3 . Here we describe the development of proteolysis-targeting antibodies (PROTABs) that tether cell-surface E3 ubiquitin ligases to transmembrane proteins, resulting in target degradation both in vitro and in vivo. Focusing on zinc- and ring finger 3 (ZNRF3), a Wnt-responsive ligase, we show that this approach can enable colorectal cancer-specific degradation. Notably, by examining a matrix of additional cell-surface E3 ubiquitin ligases and transmembrane receptors, we demonstrate that this technology is amendable for ‘on-demand’ degradation. Furthermore, we offer insights on the ground rules governing target degradation by engineering optimized antibody formats. In summary, this work describes a strategy for the rapid development of potent, bioavailable and tissue-selective degraders of cell-surface proteins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PROTAB is a bispecific antibody protein degradation technology platform comprising an anti-tag binding domain for transmembrane E3 ligases such as RNF43 or ZNRF3 and an anti-POI binding domain for the target protein; it effectively degrades IGF1R in rectal cancer patients while causing minimal degradation in normal organs, and can degrade Her2 and PD-L1 targets.
“The innovative proteolysis-targeting antibodies (PROTABs) protein degradation technology platform utilizes a bispecific antibody approach. It comprises a binding domain (anti-tag) for ubiquitin ligases targeting transmembrane E3 ligases, such as RNF43 or ZNRF3, and a binding domain (anti-POI) for the target protein. In one study, PROTAB effectively degraded the insulin-like growth factor 1”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [534]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- Marei, H., Tsai, W.-T. K., Kee, Y.-S., Ruiz, K., He, J., Cox, C., Sun, T., Penikalapati, S., Dwivedi, P., Choi, M., Kan, D., Saenz-Lopez, P., Dorighi, K., Zhang, P., Kschonsak, Y. T., Kljavin, N., Amin, D., Kim, I., Mancini, A. G., Nguyen, T., Wang, C., Janezic, E., Doan, A., Mai, E., Xi, H., Gu, C., Heinlein, M., Biehs, B., Wu, J., Lehoux, I., Harris, S., Comps-Agrar, L., Seshasayee, D., de Sauvage, F. J., Grimmer, M., Li, J., Agard, N. J., & de Sousa e Melo, F.
- Affiliations
- Genentech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Agard, Nicholas J.
- ORCID
- Marei, Hadir
- Tsai, Wen-Ting K.
- Kee, Yee-Seir
- He, Jieyan
- Sun, Tao
- Penikalapati, Sai
- Dwivedi, Pankaj
- Choi, Meena
- Kan, David
- Dorighi, Kristel
- Kschonsak, Yvonne T.
- Kljavin, Noelyn
- Mancini, Andrew G.
- Nguyen, Thao
- Wang, Chunling
- Janezic, Eric
- Heinlein, Melanie
- Wu, Jia
- Harris, Seth
- Seshasayee, Dhaya
- de Sauvage, Frederic J.
- Grimmer, Matthew
- Li, Jing
- Agard, Nicholas J.
- de Sousa e Melo, Felipe
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2022-09-21
- Volume
- 610
- Issue
- 7930
- Pages
- 182-189
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC9534761
- OpenAlex
- W4296700653
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Genentech
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Keywords
- PROTACs, E3 ubiquitin ligase, targeted protein degradation, ZNRF3, Wnt signaling, colorectal cancer, cell surface receptors, transmembrane proteins, antibody engineering, oral bioavailability
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Antibody Specificity, Ligands, Membrane Proteins, Receptors, Cell Surface, Substrate Specificity, Colorectal Neoplasms, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review