Cited by 228Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and Cryptography

High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit

Open access
Ma, Shuo, Liu, Genyue, Peng, Pai, Zhang, Bichen, Jandura, Sven, Claes, Jahan, Burgers, Alex P., Pupillo, Guido +2 more·2023·Nature

Abstract

The development of scalable, high-fidelity qubits is a key challenge in quantum information science. Neutral atom qubits have progressed rapidly in recent years, demonstrating programmable processors 1,2 and quantum simulators with scaling to hundreds of atoms 3,4. Exploring new atomic species, such as alkaline earth atoms 5-7, or combining multiple species 8 can provide new paths to improving coherence, control and scalability. For example, for eventual application in quantum error correction, it is advantageous to realize qubits with structured error models, such as biased Pauli errors 9 or conversion of errors into detectable erasures 10. Here we demonstrate a new neutral atom qubit using the nuclear spin of a long-lived metastable state in 171 Yb. The long coherence time and fast excitation to the Rydberg state allow one- and two-qubit gates with fidelities of 0.9990(1) and 0.980(1), respectively. Importantly, a large fraction of all gate errors result in decays out of the qubit subspace to the ground state. By performing fast, mid-circuit detection of these errors, we convert them into erasure errors; during detection, the induced error probability on qubits remaining in the computational space is less than 10-5. This work establishes metastable 171 Yb as a promising platform for realizing fault-tolerant quantum computing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-06438-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The system has mid-circuit readout.

    “Using logical-level control and a zoned architecture in reconfigurable neutral-atom arrays7, our system combines high two-qubit gate fidelities8, arbitrary connectivity7,9, as well as fully programmable single-qubit rotations and mid-circuit readout10–15.”

    From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The paper reports mid-circuit imaging to detect atoms that have decayed to the ground state (Abstract; page unavailable). But it says its demonstrated detection protocol *could be adapted* to mid-circuit qubit readout; it does not report demonstrating that readout. Thus it supports mid-circuit erasure detection, not the full readout attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The logical processor uses logical-level control and a zoned architecture in reconfigurable neutral-atom arrays.

    “Using logical-level control and a zoned architecture in reconfigurable neutral-atom arrays7, our system combines high two-qubit gate fidelities8, arbitrary connectivity7,9, as well as fully programmable single-qubit rotations and mid-circuit readout10–15.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 228

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [5]5. A. Cooper, J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. Endres, Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers, Physical Review X 8, 041055 (2018).
  2. [6]6. M. Norcia, A. Young, and A. Kaufman, Microscopic Control and Detection of Ultracold Strontium in Optical-Tweezer Arrays, Physical Review X 8, 041054 (2018).
  3. [8]8. K. Singh, S. Anand, A. Pocklington, J. T. Kemp, and H. Bernien, Dual-Element, Two-Dimensional Atom Array with Continuous-Mode Operation, Physical Review X 12, 011040 (2022).
  4. [16]16. I. S. Madjarov, A. Cooper, A. L. Shaw, J. P. Covey, V. Schkolnik, T. H. Yoon, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, An Atomic-Array Optical Clock with Single-Atom Readout, Physical Review X 9, 041052 (2019).
  5. [18]18. S. Ma, A. P. Burgers, G. Liu, J. Wilson, B. Zhang, and J. D. Thompson, Universal Gate Operations on Nuclear Spin Qubits in an Optical Tweezer Array of Yb 171 Atoms, Physical Review X 12, 021028 (2022).
  6. [19]19. A. Jenkins, J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, and A. M. Kaufman, Ytterbium Nuclear-Spin Qubits in an Optical Tweezer Array, Physical Review X 12, 021027 (2022).
  7. [25]25. C. H. Roman, Expanding the 171 Yb + toolbox: the 2 F o 7/2 state as resource for quantum information science, PhD Thesis, UCLA (2021).
  8. [30]30. A. Kubica, A. Haim, Y. Vaknin, F. Brandão, and A. Retzker, Erasure qubits: Overcoming the T1 limit in superconducting circuits (2022), arXiv:2208.05461 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  9. [32]32. J. D. Teoh, P. Winkel, H. K. Babla, B. J. Chapman, J. Claes, S. J. de Graaf, J. W. O. Garmon, W. D. Kalfus, Y. Lu, A. Maiti, K. Sahay, N. Thakur, T. Tsunoda, S. H. Xue, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, S. Puri, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Dual-rail encoding with superconducting cavities (2022), arXiv:2212.12077 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
  10. [34]34. Y. Lu, A. Maiti, J. W. O. Garmon, S. Ganjam, Y. Zhang, J. Claes, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, A high-fidelity microwave beamsplitter with a parity-protected converter (2023), arXiv:2303.00959 [quant-ph]. · arXiv

Authors
Ma, S., Liu, G., Peng, P., Zhang, B., Jandura, S., Claes, J., Burgers, A. P., Pupillo, G., Puri, S., & Thompson, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Jeff D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-10-11
Volume
622
Issue
7982
Pages
279-284
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4387517741
Cited by
228
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 7
FWCI
26.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2120757)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, HORIZON-CL4-2021-DIGITAL-EMERGING-01, 955479, 101070144)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-ESRE-0032)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF2010021)
  • HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (101070144, HORIZON-CL4-2021-DIGITALEMERGING-01-30, HORIZON-CL4-2021-DIGITAL-EMERGING-01)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-20-1-2426, N00014)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-1810215, W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
neutral atom qubits, 171Yb, nuclear spin qubits, metastable states, Rydberg states, optical tweezers, two-qubit gates, gate fidelity, erasure errors, fault-tolerant quantum computing, quantum error correction, trapped ions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review