Cited by 25RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsExtracellular vesicles in disease

Structural basis of mRNA decay by the human exosome–ribosome supercomplex

Open access
Kögel, Alexander, Keidel, Achim, Loukeri, Matina-Jasemi, Kuhn, Christopher C., Langer, Lukas M., Schäfer, Ingmar B., Conti, Elena·2024·Nature

Abstract

The interplay between translation and mRNA decay is widespread in human cells 1–3 . In quality-control pathways, exonucleolytic degradation of mRNA associated with translating ribosomes is mediated largely by the cytoplasmic exosome 4–9 , which includes the exoribonuclease complex EXO10 and the helicase complex SKI238 (refs. 10–16 ). The helicase can extract mRNA from the ribosome and is expected to transfer it to the exoribonuclease core through a bridging factor, HBS1L3 (also known as SKI7), but the mechanisms of this molecular handover remain unclear 7,17,18 . Here we reveal how human EXO10 is recruited by HBS1L3 (SKI7) to an active ribosome-bound SKI238 complex. We show that rather than a sequential handover, a direct physical coupling mechanism takes place, which culminates in the formation of a cytoplasmic exosome–ribosome supercomplex. Capturing the structure during active decay reveals a continuous path in which an RNA substrate threads from the 80S ribosome through the SKI2 helicase into the exoribonuclease active site of the cytoplasmic exosome complex. The SKI3 subunit of the complex directly binds to HBS1L3 (SKI7) and also engages a surface of the 40S subunit, establishing a recognition platform in collided disomes. Exosome and ribosome thus work together as a single structural and functional unit in co-translational mRNA decay, coordinating their activities in a transient supercomplex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-024-08015-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 25

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. [1]Wu, Q. & Bazzini, A. A. Translation and mRNA stability control. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 92, 227–245 (2023). 37001134 · DOI
  2. [2]Morris, C., Cluet, D. & Ricci, E. P. Ribosome dynamics and mRNA turnover, a complex relationship under constant cellular scrutiny. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 12, e1658 (2021). 33949788 PMC8519046 · DOI
  3. [3]D’Orazio, K. N. & Green, R. Ribosome states signal RNA quality control. Mol. Cell 81, 1372–1383 (2021). 33713598 PMC8041214 · DOI
  4. [4]Hu, W., Sweet, T. J., Chamnongpol, S., Baker, K. E. & Coller, J. Co-translational mRNA decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 461, 225–229 (2009). 19701183 PMC2745705 · DOI
  5. [5]Pelechano, V., Wei, W. & Steinmetz, L. M. Widespread co-translational RNA decay reveals ribosome dynamics. Cell 161, 1400–1412 (2015). 26046441 PMC4461875 · DOI
  6. [6]Tuck, A. C. et al. Mammalian RNA decay pathways are highly specialized and widely linked to translation. Mol. Cell 77, 1222–1236 (2020). 32048998 PMC7083229 · DOI
  7. [7]Zinoviev, A., Ayupov, R. K., Abaeva, I. S., Hellen, C. U. T. & Pestova, T. V. Extraction of mRNA from stalled ribosomes by the Ski complex. Mol. Cell 77, 1340–1349 (2020). 32006463 PMC7934606 · DOI
  8. [8]Hopfler, M. et al. Mechanism of ribosome-associated mRNA degradation during tubulin autoregulation. Mol. Cell 83, 2290–2302 (2023). 37295431 PMC10403363 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [9]Monaghan, L., Longman, D. & Caceres, J. F. Translation-coupled mRNA quality control mechanisms. EMBO J. 42, e114378 (2023). 37605642 PMC10548175 · DOI
  10. [10]Zinder, J. C. & Lima, C. D. Targeting RNA for processing or destruction by the eukaryotic RNA exosome and its cofactors. Genes Dev. 31, 88–100 (2017). 28202538 PMC5322736 · DOI
  11. [11]Makino, D. L., Baumgartner, M. & Conti, E. Crystal structure of an RNA-bound 11-subunit eukaryotic exosome complex. Nature 495, 70–75 (2013). 23376952 · DOI
  12. [12]Staals, R. H. et al. Dis3-like 1: a novel exoribonuclease associated with the human exosome. EMBO J. 29, 2358–2367 (2010). 20531389 PMC2910272 · DOI
  13. [13]Tomecki, R. & Dziembowski, A. Novel endoribonucleases as central players in various pathways of eukaryotic RNA metabolism. RNA 16, 1692–1724 (2010). 20675404 PMC2924532 · DOI
  14. [14]Tomecki, R., Drazkowska, K., Kobylecki, K. & Tudek, A. SKI complex: a multifaceted cytoplasmic RNA exosome cofactor in mRNA metabolism with links to disease, developmental processes, and antiviral responses. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 14, e1795 (2023). 37384835 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [15]Fasken, M. B. et al. The RNA exosome and human disease. Methods Mol. Biol. 2062, 3–33 (2020). 31768969 · DOI
  16. [16]Saramago, M., da Costa, P. J., Viegas, S. C. & Arraiano, C. M. The implication of mRNA degradation disorders on human DISease: focus on DIS3 and DIS3-like enzymes. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1157, 85–98 (2019). 31342438 · DOI
  17. [17]Kogel, A., Keidel, A., Bonneau, F., Schafer, I. B. & Conti, E. The human SKI complex regulates channeling of ribosome-bound RNA to the exosome via an intrinsic gatekeeping mechanism. Mol. Cell 82, 756–769 (2022). 35120588 PMC8860381 · DOI
  18. [18]Schmidt, C. et al. The cryo-EM structure of a ribosome-Ski2–Ski3–Ski8 helicase complex. Science 354, 1431–1433 (2016). 27980209 · DOI
  19. [19]Halbach, F., Reichelt, P., Rode, M. & Conti, E. The yeast Ski complex: crystal structure and RNA channeling to the exosome complex. Cell 154, 814–826 (2013). 23953113 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [20]Araki, Y. et al. Ski7p G protein interacts with the exosome and the Ski complex for 3’-to-5’ mRNA decay in yeast. EMBO J. 20, 4684–4693 (2001). 11532933 PMC125587 · DOI
  21. [21]van Hoof, A., Frischmeyer, P. A., Dietz, H. C. & Parker, R. Exosome-mediated recognition and degradation of mRNAs lacking a termination codon. Science 295, 2262–2264 (2002). 11910110 · DOI
  22. [22]Kowalinski, E. et al. Structure of a cytoplasmic 11-subunit RNA exosome complex. Mol. Cell 63, 125–134 (2016). 27345150 PMC4942675 · DOI
  23. [23]Keidel, A. et al. Concerted structural rearrangements enable RNA channeling into the cytoplasmic Ski238–Ski7–exosome assembly. Mol. Cell 83, 4093–4105 (2023). 37879335 PMC10659929 · DOI
  24. [24]Kalisiak, K. et al. A short splicing isoform of HBS1L links the cytoplasmic exosome and SKI complexes in humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 2068–2080 (2017). 28204585 PMC5389692
  25. [25]Saito, S., Hosoda, N. & Hoshino, S. The Hbs1–Dom34 protein complex functions in non-stop mRNA decay in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 17832–17843 (2013). 23667253 PMC3682582 · DOI
  26. [26]Sinitcyn, P. et al. Global detection of human variants and isoforms by deep proteome sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1776–1786 (2023). 36959352 PMC10713452 · DOI
  27. [28]Gerlach, P. et al. Distinct and evolutionary conserved structural features of the human nuclear exosome complex. eLife 7, e38686 (2018). 30047866 PMC6072439 · DOI
  28. [30]Tomecki, R. et al. The human core exosome interacts with differentially localized processive RNases: hDIS3 and hDIS3L. EMBO J. 29, 2342–2357 (2010). 20531386 PMC2910271 · DOI
  29. [31]Schuller, J. M., Falk, S., Fromm, L., Hurt, E. & Conti, E. Structure of the nuclear exosome captured on a maturing preribosome. Science 360, 219–222 (2018). 29519915 · DOI
  30. [32]Fabre, A., Martinez-Vinson, C., Goulet, O. & Badens, C. Syndromic diarrhea/Tricho-hepato-enteric syndrome. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 8, 5 (2013). 23302111 PMC3560276 · DOI
  31. [33]Narita, M. et al. A distinct mammalian disome collision interface harbors K63-linked polyubiquitination of uS10 to trigger hRQT-mediated subunit dissociation. Nat. Commun. 13, 6411 (2022). 36302773 PMC9613687 · DOI
  32. [34]Chandrasekaran, V. et al. Mechanism of ribosome stalling during translation of a poly(A) tail. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 1132–1140 (2019). 31768042 PMC6900289 · DOI
  33. [35]Bieniossek, C., Imasaki, T., Takagi, Y. & Berger, I. MultiBac: expanding the research toolbox for multiprotein complexes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 49–57 (2012). 22154230 PMC7127121 · DOI
  34. [36]Fernandez, I. S., Bai, X. C., Murshudov, G., Scheres, S. H. & Ramakrishnan, V. Initiation of translation by cricket paralysis virus IRES requires its translocation in the ribosome. Cell 157, 823–831 (2014). 24792965 PMC4017093 · DOI
  35. [37]Pisarev, A. V., Unbehaun, A., Hellen, C. U. & Pestova, T. V. Assembly and analysis of eukaryotic translation initiation complexes. Methods Enzymol. 430, 147–177 (2007). 17913638 · DOI
  36. [38]Petrov, A., Grosely, R., Chen, J., O’Leary, S. E. & Puglisi, J. D. Multiple parallel pathways of translation initiation on the CrPV IRES. Mol. Cell 62, 92–103 (2016). 27058789 PMC4826567 · DOI
  37. [39]Autour, A. et al. Fluorogenic RNA Mango aptamers for imaging small non-coding RNAs in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 656 (2018). 29440634 PMC5811451 · DOI
  38. [40]Schorb, M., Haberbosch, I., Hagen, W. J. H., Schwab, Y. & Mastronarde, D. N. Software tools for automated transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 16, 471–477 (2019). 31086343 PMC7000238 · DOI
  39. [41]Biyani, N. et al. Focus: the interface between data collection and data processing in cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 198, 124–133 (2017). 28344036 · DOI
  40. [42]Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). 28250466 PMC5494038 · DOI
  41. [43]Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016). 26592709 PMC4711343 · DOI
  42. [44]Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018). 30412051 PMC6250425 · DOI
  43. [45]Khatter, H., Myasnikov, A. G., Natchiar, S. K. & Klaholz, B. P. Structure of the human 80S ribosome. Nature 520, 640–645 (2015). 25901680 · DOI
  44. [46]Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003). 14568533 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [47]Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021). 34267316 PMC8282847 · DOI
  46. [49]Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004). 15264254 · DOI
  47. [50]Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010). 20383002 PMC2852313 · DOI
  48. [51]Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D 75, 861–877 (2019). PMC6778852 31588918 · DOI
  49. [52]Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010). 20057044 PMC2803126 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [54]Simms, C. L., Yan, L. L. & Zaher, H. S. Ribosome collision is critical for quality control during no-go decay. Mol. Cell 68, 361–373 (2017). 28943311 PMC5659757 · DOI
  51. [55]Juszkiewicz, S. et al. ZNF598 is a quality control sensor of collided ribosomes. Mol. Cell 72, 469–481 (2018). 30293783 PMC6224477 · DOI
  52. [56]Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 531–544 (2018). PMC6096492 29872004 · DOI

Authors
Kögel, A., Keidel, A., Loukeri, M.-J., Kuhn, C. C., Langer, L. M., Schäfer, I. B., & Conti, E.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Schäfer, Ingmar B.
  • Conti, Elena
Venue
Nature
Published
2024-10-09
Volume
635
Issue
8037
Pages
237-242
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4403244153
Cited by
25
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
mRNA degradation, exosomes, ribosome, exonucleolytic degradation, 80S ribosome, 40S ribosomal subunit, protein complex structure
MeSH terms
Cytoplasm, DNA Helicases, Exoribonucleases, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Ribosomes, RNA, Messenger, Protein Biosynthesis, HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins, GTP-Binding Proteins, Cryoelectron Microscopy, RNA Helicases, RNA Stability, Exosomes, Exosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review