Cited by 1Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Publisher Correction: A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for universal quantum computation

Open access

Abstract

In the version of the article initially published, in Fig. 3d, the label “Transversal (corrected decoding)” should have read “Transversal (correlated decoding)” and has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-026-10108-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A rotated surface code variant is a popular choice in experimental demonstrations of QEC.

    “We note that a variant of the unrotated surface code that has been rotated 45◦ is a popular choice in experimental demonstrations of QEC [26, 31, 37, 105].”

    From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Publisher Correction (Nature 650, p. E3) only changes a Fig. 3d label from “corrected decoding” to “correlated decoding.” Searches for a rotated surface code and its use in experimental QEC demonstrations found no passage addressing either point in this correction. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bluvstein, D., Geim, A. A., Li, S. H., Evered, S. J., Bonilla Ataides, J. P., Baranes, G., Gu, A., Manovitz, T., Xu, M., Kalinowski, M., Majidy, S., Kokail, C., Maskara, N., Trapp, E. C., Stewart, L. M., Hollerith, S., Zhou, H., Gullans, M. J., Yelin, S. F., Greiner, M., Vuletić, V., Cain, M., & Lukin, M. D.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Lukin, Mikhail D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2026-01-19
Volume
650
Issue
8100
Pages
E3-E3
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W7124828150
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
fault-tolerant quantum computing, neutral atoms, quantum computing architecture, universal quantum computation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review