A DNA-of-things storage architecture to create materials with embedded memory.
Abstract
DNA storage offers substantial information density 1-7 and exceptional half-life 3. We devised a 'DNA-of-things' (DoT) storage architecture to produce materials with immutable memory. In a DoT framework, DNA molecules record the data, and these molecules are then encapsulated in nanometer silica beads 8, which are fused into various materials that are used to print or cast objects in any shape. First, we applied DoT to three-dimensionally print a Stanford Bunny 9 that contained a 45 kB digital DNA blueprint for its synthesis. We synthesized five generations of the bunny, each from the memory of the previous generation without additional DNA synthesis or degradation of information. To test the scalability of DoT, we stored a 1.4 MB video in DNA in plexiglass spectacle lenses and retrieved it by excising a tiny piece of the plexiglass and sequencing the embedded DNA. DoT could be applied to store electronic health records in medical implants, to hide data in everyday objects (steganography) and to manufacture objects containing their own blueprint. It may also facilitate the development of self-replicating machines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A DNA-of-things storage architecture was proposed to create materials with embedded memory.
“Koch et al. (2020) proposed a DNA-of-things storage architecture to create materials with embedded memory.”
From Large-Scale de Novo Oligonucleotide Synthesis for Whole-Genome Synthesis and Data Storage: Challenges and Opportunities (2021) · cites this paper as Koch et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 183
- Authors
- Koch, J., Gantenbein, S., Masania, K., Stark, W. J., Erlich, Y., & Grass, R. N.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Erlich, Yaniv
- Grass, Robert N.
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2019-12-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-43
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W2992522882
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Internal funds
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks
- Keywords
- DNA data storage, silica beads, 3D printing, video storage, steganography, biomedical implants, self-replicating machines, information density
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Preservation, Biological, Gene Library, Printing, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review