Cell segmentation in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics
Abstract
Single-molecule spatial transcriptomics protocols based on in situ sequencing or multiplexed RNA fluorescent hybridization can reveal detailed tissue organization. However, distinguishing the boundaries of individual cells in such data is challenging and can hamper downstream analysis. Current methods generally approximate cells positions using nuclei stains. We describe a segmentation method, Baysor, that optimizes two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) cell boundaries considering joint likelihood of transcriptional composition and cell morphology. While Baysor can take into account segmentation based on co-stains, it can also perform segmentation based on the detected transcripts alone. To evaluate performance, we extend multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) to incorporate immunostaining of cell boundaries. Using this and other benchmarks, we show that Baysor segmentation can, in some cases, nearly double the number of cells compared to existing tools while reducing segmentation artifacts. We demonstrate that Baysor performs well on data acquired using five different protocols, making it a useful general tool for analysis of imaging-based spatial transcriptomics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Baysor incorporates cell-shape information from histological images to enhance segmentation results.
“Baysor222 additionally incorporates cell-shape information obtained through the histological image to enhance segmentation results.”
From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [222]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 412
- Authors
- Petukhov, V., Xu, R. J., Soldatov, R. A., Cadinu, P., Khodosevich, K., Moffitt, J. R., & Kharchenko, P. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kharchenko, Peter V.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2021-10-14
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-354
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W3205339884
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 111 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 15.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (U01 MH114828)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Keywords
- cell segmentation, spatial transcriptomics, MERFISH, in situ sequencing, cell boundary detection, cell morphology, immunostaining, 3D cell segmentation, nuclear staining
- MeSH terms
- RNA, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review