Cited by 412Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsCell Image Analysis TechniquesMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Cell segmentation in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics

Petukhov, Viktor, Xu, Rosalind J., Soldatov, Ruslan A., Cadinu, Paolo, Khodosevich, Konstantin, Moffitt, Jeffrey R., Kharchenko, Peter V.·2022·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Single-molecule spatial transcriptomics protocols based on in situ sequencing or multiplexed RNA fluorescent hybridization can reveal detailed tissue organization. However, distinguishing the boundaries of individual cells in such data is challenging and can hamper downstream analysis. Current methods generally approximate cells positions using nuclei stains. We describe a segmentation method, Baysor, that optimizes two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) cell boundaries considering joint likelihood of transcriptional composition and cell morphology. While Baysor can take into account segmentation based on co-stains, it can also perform segmentation based on the detected transcripts alone. To evaluate performance, we extend multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) to incorporate immunostaining of cell boundaries. Using this and other benchmarks, we show that Baysor segmentation can, in some cases, nearly double the number of cells compared to existing tools while reducing segmentation artifacts. We demonstrate that Baysor performs well on data acquired using five different protocols, making it a useful general tool for analysis of imaging-based spatial transcriptomics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-021-01044-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Baysor incorporates cell-shape information from histological images to enhance segmentation results.

    “Baysor222 additionally incorporates cell-shape information obtained through the histological image to enhance segmentation results.”

    From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [222]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 412

Authors
Petukhov, V., Xu, R. J., Soldatov, R. A., Cadinu, P., Khodosevich, K., Moffitt, J. R., & Kharchenko, P. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kharchenko, Peter V.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2021-10-14
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
345-354
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W3205339884
Cited by
412
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 1
FWCI
15.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (U01 MH114828)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
cell segmentation, spatial transcriptomics, MERFISH, in situ sequencing, cell boundary detection, cell morphology, immunostaining, 3D cell segmentation, nuclear staining
MeSH terms
RNA, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review