Translation efficiency covariation identifies conserved coordination patterns across cell types
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Characterizing shared patterns of RNA expression between genes across conditions has led to the discovery of regulatory networks and biological functions. However, it is unclear if such coordination extends to translation. In this study, we uniformly analyze 3,819 ribosome profiling datasets from 117 human and 94 mouse tissues and cell lines. We introduce the concept of translation efficiency covariation (TEC), identifying coordinated translation patterns across cell types. We nominate candidate mechanisms driving shared patterns of translation regulation. TEC is conserved across human and mouse cells and uncovers gene functions that are not evident from RNA or protein co-expression. Moreover, our observations indicate that proteins that physically interact are highly enriched for positive covariation at both translational and transcriptional levels. Our findings establish TEC as a conserved organizing principle of mammalian transcriptomes. TEC has potential as a predictive marker for gene function and may offer a framework for designing gene expression systems in synthetic biology and biotechnological applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 172 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Rao, S., Hoskins, I., Geng, M., Zhao, Q., Chacko, J., Ghatpande, V., Qi, K., Persyn, L., Wang, J., Zheng, D., Zhong, Y., Park, D., Sarinay Cenik, E., Agarwal, V., Ozadam, H., & Cenik, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cenik, Can
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2025-07-25
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 797-809
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- PMC
- PMC12329774
- OpenAlex
- W4412707796
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 172
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM150667, GM138340)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD110096)
- Welch Foundation (F-2027-20230405, F-2133-20230405)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- ribosome profiling, gene co-expression, protein-protein interaction, translational regulation, human and mouse tissues, cell lines, gene function prediction, synthetic biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review