Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in the Japanese population links cell types to complex human diseases
Open accessAbstract
Clinical measurements can be viewed as useful intermediate phenotypes to promote understanding of complex human diseases. To acquire comprehensive insights into the underlying genetics, here we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 58 quantitative traits in 162,255 Japanese individuals. Overall, we identified 1,407 trait-associated loci (P < 5.0 × 10−8), 679 of which were novel. By incorporating 32 additional GWAS results for complex diseases and traits in Japanese individuals, we further highlighted pleiotropy, genetic correlations, and cell-type specificity across quantitative traits and diseases, which substantially expands the current understanding of the associated genetics and biology. This study identified both shared polygenic effects and cell-type specificity, represented by the genetic links among clinical measurements, complex diseases, and relevant cell types. Our findings demonstrate that even without prior biological knowledge of cross-phenotype relationships, genetics corresponding to clinical measurements successfully recapture those measurements’ relevance to diseases, and thus can contribute to the elucidation of unknown etiology and pathogenesis. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 58 traits using data from the Biobank Japan Project identifies 1,407 loci, 679 of which are novel. Comparison with disease GWASs and analysis of genetic correlations and cell-type enrichment show that these clinical measurements are relevant to human disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BBJ is a registry of over 200,000 Japanese patients including information about 47 diseases and 59 quantitative traits.
“BBJ is a registry of over 200,000 Japanese patients including information about 47 diseases and 59 quantitative traits (Supplemental Table 1) [29, 30].”
From Denisovan and Neanderthal archaic introgression differentially impacted the genetics of complex traits in modern populations (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
The Additional information section describes BBJ as a hospital-based registry of approximately 200,000 patients diagnosed with one or more of 47 target diseases. The paper reports a GWAS of 58 quantitative traits, expanding to 59 in later analyses that incorporated additional GWAS results. It does not establish that the registry contained over 200,000 patients or that information on all 59 traits was collected for its patients. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOther pleiotropic relationships connect diseases and traits in surprising ways, highlighting shared polygenic effects and cell-type specificity and delivering insights into shared biology and overlapping mechanisms.
“Others connect diseases and traits in surprising ways, highlighting shared polygenic, pleiotropic effects and cell-type specificity, and delivering insights into shared biology and overlapping mechanisms86,87.”
From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [86]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 801
- Authors
- Kanai, M., Akiyama, M., Takahashi, A., Matoba, N., Momozawa, Y., Ikeda, M., Iwata, N., Ikegawa, S., Hirata, M., Matsuda, K., Kubo, M., Okada, Y., & Kamatani, Y.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (JP)
- National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP)
- Fujita Health University (JP)
- Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Okada, Yukinori
- Kamatani, Yoichiro
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2018-02-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 390-400
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- OpenAlex
- W2789833091
- Cited by
- 801
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 21 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 50.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (16km0405206h0001, 16gm6010001h0001, 17ek0410041h0001)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (15H05911, 15H05670, 15H05907)
- Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
- Senri Life Science Foundation
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H03269, 17H04251, 16gm6010001h0001, 16H05378, 16K15738, 16H02676, 17H03596, 16km0405206h0001, 15H05911, 15H05907, 17ek0410041h0001, 15K14429, 15H05670)
- Daiichi Sankyo Europe
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- quantitative traits, clinical measurement, endophenotypes, complex diseases, cell type specificity, pleiotropy, genetic correlation, polygenic effects, novel loci, Japanese population, etiology
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Disease, Female, Genetics, Population, Humans, Japan, Male, Phenotype, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Cell Lineage, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Asian People, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Association Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review