Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whole-genome deep-learning analysis identifies contribution of noncoding mutations to autism risk

Open access
Zhou, Jian, Park, Christopher Y., Theesfeld, Chandra L., Wong, Aaron K., Yuan, Yuan, Scheckel, Claudia, Fak, John J., Funk, Julien, Yao, Kevin, Tajima, Yoko, Packer, Alan, Darnell, Robert B., Troyanskaya, Olga G.·2019·Nature Genetics

Abstract

We address the challenge of detecting the contribution of noncoding mutations to disease with a deep-learning-based framework that predicts the specific regulatory effects and the deleterious impact of genetic variants. Applying this framework to 1,790 autism spectrum disorder (ASD) simplex families reveals a role in disease for noncoding mutations—ASD probands harbor both transcriptional- and post-transcriptional-regulation-disrupting de novo mutations of significantly higher functional impact than those in unaffected siblings. Further analysis suggests involvement of noncoding mutations in synaptic transmission and neuronal development and, taken together with previous studies, reveals a convergent genetic landscape of coding and noncoding mutations in ASD. We demonstrate that sequences carrying prioritized mutations identified in probands possess allele-specific regulatory activity, and we highlight a link between noncoding mutations and heterogeneity in the IQ of ASD probands. Our predictive genomics framework illuminates the role of noncoding mutations in ASD and prioritizes mutations with high impact for further study, and is broadly applicable to complex human diseases. Application of a deep-learning-based framework shows that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) harbor regulation-disrupting mutations of higher functional impact than those in unaffected siblings and identifies a convergent genetic landscape of coding and noncoding de novo mutations in ASD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-019-0420-0

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, J., Park, C. Y., Theesfeld, C. L., Wong, A. K., Yuan, Y., Scheckel, C., Fak, J. J., Funk, J., Yao, K., Tajima, Y., Packer, A., Darnell, R. B., & Troyanskaya, O. G.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2019-05-27
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
973-980
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2946936654
Cited by
284
References
55
FWCI
23.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whole-genome deep-learning analysis identifies contribution of noncoding mutations to autism risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41588-019-0420-0
The paper
Zhou, J., Park, C. Y., Theesfeld, C. L., Wong, A. K., Yuan, Y., Scheckel, C., Fak, J. J., Funk, J., Yao, K., Tajima, Y., Packer, A., Darnell, R. B., & Troyanskaya, O. G. (2019). Whole-genome deep-learning analysis identifies contribution of noncoding mutations to autism risk. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0420-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.