Cited by 295Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyCognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Genome-wide association analysis of 19,629 individuals identifies variants influencing regional brain volumes and refines their genetic co-architecture with cognitive and mental health traits

Open access
Zhao, Bingxin, Luo, Tianyou, Li, Tengfei, Li, Yun, Zhang, Jingwen, Shan, Yue, Wang, Xifeng, Yang, Liuqing +5 more·2019·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Volumetric variations of the human brain are heritable and are associated with many brain-related complex traits. Here we performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of 101 brain volumetric phenotypes using the UK Biobank sample including 19,629 participants. GWAS identified 365 independent genetic variants exceeding a significance threshold of 4.9 × 10-10, adjusted for testing multiple phenotypes. A gene-based association study found 157 associated genes (124 new), and functional gene mapping analysis linked 146 additional genes. Many of the discovered genetic variants and genes have previously been implicated in cognitive and mental health traits. Through genome-wide polygenic-risk-score prediction, more than 6% of the phenotypic variance (P = 3.13 × 10-24) in four other independent studies could be explained by the UK Biobank GWAS results. In conclusion, our study identifies many new genetic associations at the variant, locus and gene levels and advances our understanding of the pleiotropy and genetic co-architecture between brain volumes and other traits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-019-0516-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other genes among the 34, including CADM2, ZIC4, GABRA2, NEGR1, and FURIN, have previously been identified in GWAS of behavioral or psychiatric traits.

    “Other genes among the 34 have previously been identified in GWAS of behavioral or psychiatric traits: Cell Adhesion Molecule 2 (CADM2, previously identified in GWAS related to self-regulation, including drug use and risk tolerance17,33), Zic Family Member 4 (ZIC4, associated with brain volume34), Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Subunit Alpha 2 (GABRA2; the site of action for alcohol and”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 104 · Cited by 295

Authors
Zhao, B., Luo, T., Li, T., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Shan, Y., Wang, X., Yang, L., Zhou, F., Zhu, Z., Initiative, A. D. N., Pediatric Imaging, N. A. G., & Zhu, H.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2019-11
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
1637-1644
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2986919234
Cited by
295
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
18.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (MH086633, MH116527)
  • Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
brain volume, genetic variants, cognitive characteristics, pleiotropy, polygenic risk score, gene mapping, heritability, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Female, Genetic Markers, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Cohort Studies, Linkage Disequilibrium, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Young Adult, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review