Cited by 79Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Ultraconserved enhancer function does not require perfect sequence conservation

Open access
Snetkova, Valentina, Ypsilanti, Athena R., Akiyama, Jennifer A., Mannion, Brandon J., Plajzer-Frick, Ingrid, Novak, Catherine S., Harrington, Anne N., Pham, Quan T. +13 more·2021·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Ultraconserved enhancer sequences show perfect conservation between human and rodent genomes, suggesting that their functions are highly sensitive to mutation. However, current models of enhancer function do not sufficiently explain this extreme evolutionary constraint. We subjected 23 ultraconserved enhancers to different levels of mutagenesis, collectively introducing 1,547 mutations, and examined their activities in transgenic mouse reporter assays. Overall, we find that the regulatory properties of ultraconserved enhancers are robust to mutation. Upon mutagenesis, nearly all (19/23, 83%) still functioned as enhancers at one developmental stage, as did most of those tested again later in development (5/9, 56%). Replacement of endogenous enhancers with mutated alleles in mice corroborated results of transgenic assays, including the functional resilience of ultraconserved enhancers to mutation. Our findings show that the currently known activities of ultraconserved enhancers do not necessarily require the perfect conservation observed in evolution and suggest that additional regulatory or other functions contribute to their sequence constraint.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-021-00812-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even enhancers with extremely high evolutionary conservation may not require the exact preservation of their sequence for their correct function.

    “Furthermore, even enhancers with extremely high evolutionary conservation may not require the exact preservation of their sequence for their correct function, as was recently shown using CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis [112].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Bejerano G Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science 304, 1321– 5 (2004). 15131266
  2. [2]Hecker N & Hiller M A genome alignment of 120 mammals highlights ultraconserved element variability and placenta-associated enhancers. Gigascience 9(2020). PMC6941714 31899510
  3. [3]Katzman S Human genome ultraconserved elements are ultraselected. Science 317, 915 (2007). 17702936
  4. [4]Drake JA Conserved noncoding sequences are selectively constrained and not mutation cold spots. Nat Genet 38, 223– 7 (2006). 16380714
  5. [5]Ovcharenko I Widespread ultraconservation divergence in primates. Mol Biol Evol 25, 1668– 76 (2008). 18492662 PMC2464743
  6. [6]Habic A Genetic Variations of Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome. OMICS 23, 549– 559 (2019). 31689173 PMC6857462
  7. [7]Pennacchio LA In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences. Nature 444, 499– 502 (2006). 17086198
  8. [8]Visel A Ultraconservation identifies a small subset of extremely constrained developmental enhancers. Nat Genet 40, 158– 60 (2008). 18176564 PMC2647775
  9. [9]Dickel DE Ultraconserved Enhancers Are Required for Normal Development. Cell 172, 491– 499 e15 (2018). 29358049 PMC5786478
  10. [10]Nolte MJ Functional analysis of limb transcriptional enhancers in the mouse. Evol Dev 16, 207– 23 (2014). 24920384 PMC4130292
  11. [11]Ahituv N Deletion of ultraconserved elements yields viable mice. PLoS Biol 5, e234 (2007). 17803355 PMC1964772
  12. [12]Gaynor KU Studies of mice deleted for Sox3 and uc482: relevance to X-linked hypoparathyroidism. Endocr Connect (2020). PMC7040864 31961795
  13. [13]Chen CT, Wang JC & Cohen BA The strength of selection on ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 80, 692– 704 (2007). 17357075 PMC1852725
  14. [14]Kryukov GV, Schmidt S & Sunyaev S Small fitness effect of mutations in highly conserved non-coding regions. Hum Mol Genet 14, 2221– 9 (2005). 15994173
  15. [15]Keightley PD, Kryukov GV, Sunyaev S, Halligan DL & Gaffney DJ Evolutionary constraints in conserved nongenic sequences of mammals. Genome Res 15, 1373– 8 (2005). 16204190 PMC1240079
  16. [17]Harmston N, Baresic A & Lenhard B The mystery of extreme non-coding conservation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368, 20130021 (2013). 24218634 PMC3826495
  17. [18]Patwardhan RP Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 30, 265– 70 (2012). 22371081 PMC3402344
  18. [19]Melnikov A Systematic dissection and optimization of inducible enhancers in human cells using a massively parallel reporter assay. Nat Biotechnol 30, 271– 7 (2012). 22371084 PMC3297981
  19. [20]Dickel DE, Visel A & Pennacchio LA Functional anatomy of distant-acting mammalian enhancers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368, 20120359 (2013). 23650633 PMC3682724
  20. [21]Kircher M Saturation mutagenesis of twenty disease-associated regulatory elements at single base-pair resolution. Nat Commun 10, 3583 (2019). 31395865 PMC6687891
  21. [22]Lettice LA, Devenney P, De Angelis C & Hill RE The Conserved Sonic Hedgehog Limb Enhancer Consists of Discrete Functional Elements that Regulate Precise Spatial Expression. Cell Rep 20, 1396– 1408 (2017). 28793263 PMC5561167
  22. [24]Kvon EZ Comprehensive In Vivo Interrogation Reveals Phenotypic Impact of Human Enhancer Variants. Cell 180, 1262– 1271 (2020). 32169219 PMC7179509
  23. [25]Karolchik D The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool. Nucleic Acids Res 32, D493– 6 (2004). 14681465 PMC308837
  24. [26]Hinrichs AS The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006. Nucleic Acids Res 34, D590– 8 (2006). 16381938 PMC1347506
  25. [27]Chiang CW Ultraconserved elements: analyses of dosage sensitivity, motifs and boundaries. Genetics 180, 2277– 93 (2008). 18957701 PMC2600958
  26. [28]Osterwalder M Enhancer redundancy provides phenotypic robustness in mammalian development. Nature 554, 239– 243 (2018). 29420474 PMC5808607
  27. [29]Turner TN Genomic Patterns of De Novo Mutation in Simplex Autism. Cell 171, 710– 722 e12 (2017). 28965761 PMC5679715
  28. [30]Fakhouri WD An etiologic regulatory mutation in IRF6 with loss- and gain-of-function effects. Hum Mol Genet 23, 2711– 20 (2014). 24442519 PMC3990169
  29. [31]Viturawong T, Meissner F, Butter F & Mann M A DNA-centric protein interaction map of ultraconserved elements reveals contribution of transcription factor binding hubs to conservation. Cell Rep 5, 531– 45 (2013). 24139795
  30. [32]McCole RB, Erceg J, Saylor W & Wu CT Ultraconserved Elements Occupy Specific Arenas of Three-Dimensional Mammalian Genome Organization. Cell Rep 24, 479– 488 (2018). 29996107 PMC6363003
  31. [33]Pollard KS, Hubisz MJ, Rosenbloom KR & Siepel A Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res 20, 110– 21 (2010). 19858363 PMC2798823
  32. [34]Gibson DG Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6, 343– 5 (2009). 19363495
  33. [35]Kvon EZ Progressive Loss of Function in a Limb Enhancer during Snake Evolution. Cell 167, 633– 642 e11 (2016). 27768887 PMC5484524
  34. [36]Montague TG, Cruz JM, Gagnon JA, Church GM & Valen E CHOPCHOP: a CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN web tool for genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res 42, W401– 7 (2014). 24861617 PMC4086086
  35. [37]Schneider CA, Rasband WS & Eliceiri KW NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 671– 5 (2012). 22930834 PMC5554542
  36. [38]Heinz S Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 38, 576– 89 (2010). 20513432 PMC2898526
  37. [39]Khan A JASPAR 2018: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles and its web framework. Nucleic Acids Res 46, D1284 (2018). 29161433 PMC5753202

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snetkova, V., Ypsilanti, A. R., Akiyama, J. A., Mannion, B. J., Plajzer-Frick, I., Novak, C. S., Harrington, A. N., Pham, Q. T., Kato, M., Zhu, Y., Godoy, J., Meky, E., Hunter, R. D., Shi, M., Kvon, E. Z., Afzal, V., Tran, S., Rubenstein, J. L. R., Visel, A., Pennacchio, L. A., & Dickel, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Visel, Axel
  • Pennacchio, Len A.
  • Dickel, Diane E.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2021-03-29
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
521-528
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W3150031743
Cited by
79
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Foundation Fyssen
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH049428)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01HG003988)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
ultraconserved elements, enhancer function, sequence conservation, mutagenesis, evolutionary constraints, developmental gene regulation
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Base Sequence, Embryo, Mammalian, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Mutation, Transcription Factors, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Conserved Sequence, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review