Cited by 173Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsDNA Repair MechanismsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Increased somatic mutation burdens in normal human cells due to defective DNA polymerases

Open access
Robinson, Philip S., Coorens, Tim H. H., Palles, Claire, Mitchell, Emily, Abascal, Federico, Olafsson, Sigurgeir, Lee, Bernard C. H., Lawson, Andrew R. J. +12 more·2021·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mutation accumulation in somatic cells contributes to cancer development and is proposed as a cause of aging. DNA polymerases Pol ε and Pol δ replicate DNA during cell division. However, in some cancers, defective proofreading due to acquired POLE / POLD1 exonuclease domain mutations causes markedly elevated somatic mutation burdens with distinctive mutational signatures. Germline POLE / POLD1 mutations cause familial cancer predisposition. Here, we sequenced normal tissue and tumor DNA from individuals with germline POLE / POLD1 mutations. Increased mutation burdens with characteristic mutational signatures were found in normal adult somatic cell types, during early embryogenesis and in sperm. Thus human physiology can tolerate ubiquitously elevated mutation burdens. Except for increased cancer risk, individuals with germline POLE / POLD1 mutations do not exhibit overt features of premature aging. These results do not support a model in which all features of aging are attributable to widespread cell malfunction directly resulting from somatic mutation burdens accrued during life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-021-00930-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cancer research suggests that colibactin causes DNA damage early after exposure.

    “cancer research suggests that colibactin causes DNA damage early after exposure [157, 158].”

    From Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces (2026) · cites this paper as [158]

    The Results (Mutational signatures; page unavailable) describe colibactin as a mutagenic product and say a signature likely due to it is predominantly acquired during childhood. This supports a link to DNA mutations, but the paper does not establish that damage occurs early after exposure; childhood acquisition is not a measure of time since exposure. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 173

Authors
Robinson, P. S., Coorens, T. H. H., Palles, C., Mitchell, E., Abascal, F., Olafsson, S., Lee, B. C. H., Lawson, A. R. J., Lee-Six, H., Moore, L., Sanders, M. A., Hewinson, J., Martin, L., Pinna, C. M. A., Galavotti, S., Rahbari, R., Campbell, P. J., Martincorena, I., Tomlinson, I., & Stratton, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Tomlinson, Ian
  • Stratton, Michael R.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2021-09-30
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
1434-1442
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W3202536610
Cited by
173
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Clinical PhD fellowship
  • Wellcome PhD Studentship
  • Jean Shank/Pathological Society Intermediate Fellowship
  • Cancer Research UK (C66259/A27114)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
somatic mutation burden, DNA polymerase proofreading, mutational signatures, embryonic development, sperm mutagenesis, aging, cancer susceptibility, DNA replication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, DNA Polymerase II, DNA Polymerase III, Humans, Intestinal Neoplasms, Intestines, Middle Aged, Phylogeny, Stem Cells, Genome, Human, Mutagenesis, Germ-Line Mutation, Embryonic Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review