Analysis of multi-condition single-cell data with latent embedding multivariate regression
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Identifying gene expression differences in heterogeneous tissues across conditions is a fundamental biological task, enabled by multi-condition single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Current data analysis approaches divide the constituent cells into clusters meant to represent cell types, but such discrete categorization tends to be an unsatisfactory model of the underlying biology. Here, we introduce latent embedding multivariate regression (LEMUR), a model that operates without, or before, commitment to discrete categorization. LEMUR (1) integrates data from different conditions, (2) predicts each cell’s gene expression changes as a function of the conditions and its position in latent space and (3) for each gene, identifies a compact neighborhood of cells with consistent differential expression. We apply LEMUR to cancer, zebrafish development and spatial gradients in Alzheimer’s disease, demonstrating its broad applicability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Ahlmann-Eltze, C., & Huber, W.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ahlmann-Eltze, Constantin
- Huber, Wolfgang
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2025-01-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 659-667
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- PMC
- PMC11906359
- OpenAlex
- W4406036487
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0263A)
- H2020 European Research Council (810296)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- differential gene expression, cellular heterogeneity, gene expression gradients, cancer, zebrafish development, Alzheimer's disease, spatial gradients
- MeSH terms
- Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, Animals, Humans, Neoplasms, Zebrafish, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review