Cited by 24Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

GCN5–ERK lactylation–phosphorylation loop amplifies lactate-driven cancer progression

Open access
Huang, Bingsong, Jin, Mingpeng, Cui, Gaofeng, Wang, Zhe, Wang, Feng, Chen, Mu, Zhu, Lei, Li, Yunxuan +19 more·2026·Nature Chemical Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The Warburg effect leads to increased lactate production and promotes cancer progression but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we found that lactate activates the MAPK pathway through ERK lactylation, which promotes cancer progression. We identified GCN5 as the lactyltransferase responsible for ERK lactylation. Activated ERK phosphorylates GCN5, increasing its lactyltransferase activity toward ERK and establishing a positive feedback loop that amplifies lactate-mediated cancer progression. We provide evidence that lactylation of ERK at residue K231 weakens its interaction with MEK, thereby promoting ERK dimerization and activation. We developed a cell-penetrating peptide that specifically inhibits ERK lactylation. This peptide impairs tumor growth in KRAS-mutant cancer models. Taken together, our findings reveal a molecular mechanism by which lactate accelerates cancer progression through the ERK-GCN5 lactylation-phosphorylation cascade and suggest a strategy to disrupt ERK lactylation in RAS-ERK-driven cancers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41589-025-02107-8

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Huang, B., Jin, M., Cui, G., Wang, Z., Wang, F., Chen, M., Zhu, L., Li, Y., Yang, X., Li, R., Wu, J., Zhai, L., He, Y., Yang, J., Ding, X., Wang, Q., Xv, Z., Ouyang, Y., Li, J., Yang, Y., Li, K., Lou, Z., Mer, G., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Yuan, J., & Zhong, C.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Jing
  • Chen, Yuping
  • Yuan, Jian
  • Zhong, Chunlong
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2026-01-13
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
634-648
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W7123363086
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 24
FWCI
76.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571184, 81771332, 82172820, 82271406)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
GCN5, lactate, Warburg effect, MAPK signaling, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, positive feedback loop, cell-penetrating peptides, KRAS-mutant cancer, tumor growth
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neoplasms, Phosphorylation, Disease Progression, Lactic Acid, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Cell Line, Tumor, Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases, p300-CBP Transcription Factors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review