Cited by 140Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsImmune cells in cancerPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation

IFNγ and GM-CSF control complementary differentiation programs in the monocyte-to-phagocyte transition during neuroinflammation

Amorim, Ana, De Feo, Donatella, Friebel, Ekaterina, Ingelfinger, Florian, Anderfuhren, Cyrill Dimitri, Krishnarajah, Sinduya, Andreadou, Myrto, Welsh, Christina A. +4 more·2022·Nature Immunology

Abstract

During inflammation, Ly6C hi monocytes are rapidly mobilized from the bone marrow (BM) and are recruited into inflamed tissues, where they undergo monocyte-to-phagocyte transition (MTPT). The in vivo developmental trajectories of the MTPT and the contribution of individual cytokines to this process remain unclear. Here, we used a murine model of neuroinflammation to investigate how granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interferon-γ (IFNγ), two type 1 cytokines, controlled MTPT. Using genetic fate mapping, gene targeting and high-dimensional single-cell multiomics analyses, we found that IFNγ was essential for the gradual acquisition of a mature inflammatory phagocyte phenotype in Ly6C hi monocytes, while GM-CSF was required to license interleukin-1β (IL-1β) production, phagocytosis and oxidative burst. These results suggest that the proinflammatory cytokine environment guided MTPT trajectories in the inflamed central nervous system (CNS) and indicated that GM-CSF was the most prominent target for the disarming of monocyte progenies during neuroinflammation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41590-021-01117-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 140

Authors
Amorim, A., De Feo, D., Friebel, E., Ingelfinger, F., Anderfuhren, C. D., Krishnarajah, S., Andreadou, M., Welsh, C. A., Liu, Z., Ginhoux, F., Greter, M., & Becher, B.
Affiliations
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Becher, Burkhard
Venue
Nature Immunology
Published
2022-01-31
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
217-228
ISSN
  • 1529-2908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2916
OpenAlex
W4210289680
Cited by
140
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030_188450, CRSII5_183478)
  • Schweizerische Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft
  • Universität Zürich
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Keywords
neuroinflammation, interferon-gamma, GM-CSF, Ly6Chi monocytes, Th1 cytokines, IL-1β, phagocytosis, respiratory burst, monocyte differentiation, multiple sclerosis
MeSH terms
Neuroinflammatory Diseases, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Female, Interferon-gamma, Macrophages, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Monocytes, Phagocytes, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Cytokines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review