Deep learning-based classification of mesothelioma improves prediction of patient outcome
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive cancer primarily diagnosed on the basis of histological criteria 1. The 2015 World Health Organization classification subdivides mesothelioma tumors into three histological types: epithelioid, biphasic and sarcomatoid MM. MM is a highly complex and heterogeneous disease, rendering its diagnosis and histological typing difficult and leading to suboptimal patient care and decisions regarding treatment modalities 2. Here we have developed a new approach-based on deep convolutional neural networks-called MesoNet to accurately predict the overall survival of mesothelioma patients from whole-slide digitized images, without any pathologist-provided locally annotated regions. We validated MesoNet on both an internal validation cohort from the French MESOBANK and an independent cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We also demonstrated that the model was more accurate in predicting patient survival than using current pathology practices. Furthermore, unlike classical black-box deep learning methods, MesoNet identified regions contributing to patient outcome prediction. Strikingly, we found that these regions are mainly located in the stroma and are histological features associated with inflammation, cellular diversity and vacuolization. These findings suggest that deep learning models can identify new features predictive of patient survival and potentially lead to new biomarker discoveries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
WSI-based deep learning can improve efficiency in predicting prognosis and treatment response.
“WSI-based deep learning can improve efficiency in predicting prognosis and treatment response fields (14–16).”
From A multimodal and fully automated system for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Histopathology whole slide image provides information that reflects molecular characteristics or genetic patterns.
“Emerging evidence has shown that histopathology whole slide image (WSI) provides information that reflects molecular characteristics or genetic patterns.”
From A multimodal and fully automated system for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
WSI-based deep learning biomarkers show potential in pCR prediction for breast cancer.
“WSI-based deep learning biomarkers show potential in pCR prediction for breast cancer (15, 16, 26).”
From A multimodal and fully automated system for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The model was developed based on single-center data.
“the model was developed based on single-center data.”
From A multimodal and fully automated system for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 544
- Authors
- Courtiol, P., Maussion, C., Moarii, M., Pronier, E., Pilcer, S., Sefta, M., Manceron, P., Toldo, S., Zaslavskiy, M., Le Stang, N., Girard, N., Elemento, O., Nicholson, A. G., Blay, J.-Y., Galateau-Sallé, F., Wainrib, G., & Clozel, T.
- Affiliations
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Centre Léon Bérard (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1519-1525
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- OpenAlex
- W2978882452
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 27.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- malignant mesothelioma, histological classification, epithelioid mesothelioma, biphasic mesothelioma, sarcomatoid mesothelioma, whole slide images, deep convolutional neural networks, mesonets, overall survival prediction, stroma, inflammation, vacuolization, cellular diversity, histological biomarkers, TCGA
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Mesothelioma, Malignant, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Mesothelioma, Prognosis, Neural Networks, Computer, Neoplasm Grading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review