Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 689

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid pathogen detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infected body fluids

Open access
Gu, Wei, Deng, Xianding, Lee, Marco, Sucu, Yasemin D., Arevalo, Shaun, Stryke, Doug, Federman, Scot, Gopez, Allan, Reyes, Kevin, Zorn, Kelsey, Sample, Hannah, Yu, Guixia, Ishpuniani, Gurpreet, Briggs, Benjamin, Chow, Eric D., Berger, Amy, Wilson, Michael R., Wang, Candace, Hsu, Elaine, Miller, Steve, DeRisi, Joseph L., Chiu, Charles Y.·2021·Nature Medicine

Abstract

We developed a metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) test using cell-free DNA from body fluids to identify pathogens. The performance of mNGS testing of 182 body fluids from 160 patients with acute illness was evaluated using two sequencing platforms in comparison to microbiological testing using culture, 16S bacterial PCR and/or 28S–internal transcribed ribosomal gene spacer (28S–ITS) fungal PCR. Test sensitivity and specificity of detection were 79 and 91% for bacteria and 91 and 89% for fungi, respectively, by Illumina sequencing; and 75 and 81% for bacteria and 91 and 100% for fungi, respectively, by nanopore sequencing. In a case series of 12 patients with culture/PCR-negative body fluids but for whom an infectious diagnosis was ultimately established, seven (58%) were mNGS positive. Real-time computational analysis enabled pathogen identification by nanopore sequencing in a median 50-min sequencing and 6-h sample-to-answer time. Rapid mNGS testing is a promising tool for diagnosis of unknown infections from body fluids. A universal method enables high-specificity, unbiased pathogen detection from diverse body fluids using metagenomic sequencing and may accelerate clinical decisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-020-1105-z

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 689

Metadata

Authors
Gu, W., Deng, X., Lee, M., Sucu, Y. D., Arevalo, S., Stryke, D., Federman, S., Gopez, A., Reyes, K., Zorn, K., Sample, H., Yu, G., Ishpuniani, G., Briggs, B., Chow, E. D., Berger, A., Wilson, M. R., Wang, C., Hsu, E., Miller, S., DeRisi, J. L., & Chiu, C. Y.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2020-11-09
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
115-124
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W3099584446
Cited by
689
References
66
FWCI
43.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid pathogen detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infected body fluids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41591-020-1105-z
The paper
Gu, W., Deng, X., Lee, M., Sucu, Y. D., Arevalo, S., Stryke, D., Federman, S., Gopez, A., Reyes, K., Zorn, K., Sample, H., Yu, G., Ishpuniani, G., Briggs, B., Chow, E. D., Berger, A., Wilson, M. R., Wang, C., Hsu, E., . . . Chiu, C. Y. (2021). Rapid pathogen detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infected body fluids. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1105-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.