Cited by 131Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersPhosphodiesterase function and regulationDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-4D in adults with fragile X syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial

Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth M., Harnett, Mark D., Reines, Scott A., Reese, Melody A., Ethridge, Lauren E., Outterson, Abigail H., Michalak, Claire, Furman, Jeremiah +1 more·2021·Nature Medicine

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether a phosphodiesterase-4D (PDE4D) allosteric inhibitor (BPN14770) would improve cognitive function and behavioral outcomes in patients with fragile X syndrome (FXS). This phase 2 trial was a 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in 30 adult male patients (age 18-41 years) with FXS. Participants received oral doses of BPN14770 25 mg twice daily or placebo. Primary outcomes were prespecified as safety and tolerability with secondary efficacy outcomes of cognitive performance, caregiver rating scales and physician rating scales (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569631 ). The study met the primary outcome measure since BPN14770 was well tolerated with no meaningful differences between the active and placebo treatment arms. The study also met key secondary efficacy measures of cognition and daily function. Cognitive benefit was demonstrated using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery assessments of Oral Reading Recognition (least squares mean difference +2.81, P = 0.0157), Picture Vocabulary (+5.81, P = 0.0342) and Cognition Crystallized Composite score (+5.31, P = 0.0018). Benefit as assessed by visual analog caregiver rating scales was judged to be clinically meaningful for language (+14.04, P = 0.0051) and daily functioning (+14.53, P = 0.0017). Results from this study using direct, computer-based assessment of cognitive performance by adult males with FXS indicate significant cognitive improvement in domains related to language with corresponding improvement in caregiver scales rating language and daily functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-021-01321-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregivers using the Visual Analog Caregiver Rating Scales demonstrated improvement in language and daily functioning.

    “The caregivers also used the Visual Analog Caregiver Rating Scales and demonstrated improvement in language and daily functioning.”
  • BPN14770 is the first treatment of FXS that demonstrated improvements in cognition, specifically in Oral Reading Recognition, Picture Vocabulary and Cognition Crystallized Composite Score in the NIH toolbox modified for use in those with ID.

    “This is the first treatment of FXS that demonstrated improvements in cognition, specifically in Oral Reading Recognition, Picture Vocabulary and Cognition Crystallized Composite Score in the NIH toolbox that has been modified for use in those with ID.”
  • A randomized controlled trial in 30 adult males with FXS demonstrated improvements with BPN14770 in behavior, the primary outcome measure (NIH toolbox), and secondary measures after only 12 weeks of treatment.

    “These studies led to patient trials of a PDE4D inhibitor called BPN14770, and an exciting study was recently published, a randomized controlled trial in 30 adult males with FXS that demonstrated improvements not only in behavior but also in the primary outcome measure, the NIH toolbox, and secondary measures after only 12 weeks of treatment [143].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 131

Authors
Berry-Kravis, E. M., Harnett, M. D., Reines, S. A., Reese, M. A., Ethridge, L. E., Outterson, A. H., Michalak, C., Furman, J., & Gurney, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Tetra Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Gurney, Mark E.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2021-04-29
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
862-870
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W3158699275
Cited by
131
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FRAXA Research Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD076189)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phosphodiesterase function and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, PDE4D, allosteric inhibitors, cognitive function, language development, daily functioning, caregiver ratings, adult male, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Language Tests, Male, Placebos, Psychometrics, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1, Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4, Young Adult, Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review