Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-4D in adults with fragile X syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine whether a phosphodiesterase-4D (PDE4D) allosteric inhibitor (BPN14770) would improve cognitive function and behavioral outcomes in patients with fragile X syndrome (FXS). This phase 2 trial was a 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in 30 adult male patients (age 18-41 years) with FXS. Participants received oral doses of BPN14770 25 mg twice daily or placebo. Primary outcomes were prespecified as safety and tolerability with secondary efficacy outcomes of cognitive performance, caregiver rating scales and physician rating scales (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569631 ). The study met the primary outcome measure since BPN14770 was well tolerated with no meaningful differences between the active and placebo treatment arms. The study also met key secondary efficacy measures of cognition and daily function. Cognitive benefit was demonstrated using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery assessments of Oral Reading Recognition (least squares mean difference +2.81, P = 0.0157), Picture Vocabulary (+5.81, P = 0.0342) and Cognition Crystallized Composite score (+5.31, P = 0.0018). Benefit as assessed by visual analog caregiver rating scales was judged to be clinically meaningful for language (+14.04, P = 0.0051) and daily functioning (+14.53, P = 0.0017). Results from this study using direct, computer-based assessment of cognitive performance by adult males with FXS indicate significant cognitive improvement in domains related to language with corresponding improvement in caregiver scales rating language and daily functioning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caregivers using the Visual Analog Caregiver Rating Scales demonstrated improvement in language and daily functioning.
“The caregivers also used the Visual Analog Caregiver Rating Scales and demonstrated improvement in language and daily functioning.”
From An Update on Psychopharmacological Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [143]
BPN14770 is the first treatment of FXS that demonstrated improvements in cognition, specifically in Oral Reading Recognition, Picture Vocabulary and Cognition Crystallized Composite Score in the NIH toolbox modified for use in those with ID.
“This is the first treatment of FXS that demonstrated improvements in cognition, specifically in Oral Reading Recognition, Picture Vocabulary and Cognition Crystallized Composite Score in the NIH toolbox that has been modified for use in those with ID.”
From An Update on Psychopharmacological Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [143]
A randomized controlled trial in 30 adult males with FXS demonstrated improvements with BPN14770 in behavior, the primary outcome measure (NIH toolbox), and secondary measures after only 12 weeks of treatment.
“These studies led to patient trials of a PDE4D inhibitor called BPN14770, and an exciting study was recently published, a randomized controlled trial in 30 adult males with FXS that demonstrated improvements not only in behavior but also in the primary outcome measure, the NIH toolbox, and secondary measures after only 12 weeks of treatment [143].”
From An Update on Psychopharmacological Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [143]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Berry-Kravis, E. M., Harnett, M. D., Reines, S. A., Reese, M. A., Ethridge, L. E., Outterson, A. H., Michalak, C., Furman, J., & Gurney, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Tetra Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gurney, Mark E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2021-04-29
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 862-870
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- OpenAlex
- W3158699275
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- FRAXA Research Foundation
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD076189)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phosphodiesterase function and regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Keywords
- fragile X syndrome, PDE4D, allosteric inhibitors, cognitive function, language development, daily functioning, caregiver ratings, adult male, drug safety and tolerability
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Language Tests, Male, Placebos, Psychometrics, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1, Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4, Young Adult, Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review