The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public
Open accessAbstract
The spread of misinformation poses a considerable threat to public health and the successful management of a global pandemic. For example, studies find that exposure to misinformation can undermine vaccination uptake and compliance with public-health guidelines. As research on the science of misinformation is rapidly emerging, this conceptual Review summarizes what we know along three key dimensions of the infodemic: susceptibility, spread, and immunization. Extant research is evaluated on the questions of why (some) people are (more) susceptible to misinformation, how misinformation spreads in online social networks, and which interventions can help to boost psychological immunity to misinformation. Implications for managing the infodemic are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Based on various theories, such as the theory of motivated reasoning, which explains that decisions are often based on pre-determined goals and desirability rather than an accurate reflection of the evidence (Kunda, 1990), researchers have identified a few individual variables that may motivate the person to believe misinformation they are exposed to.These include political orientation (Chen et al”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as van der Linden, 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The so-called inattention account posits that being bombarded with information, coupled with limited time and resources, interferes with individuals' ability to accurately reflect on the content (van der Linden, 2022).”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as van der Linden, 2022
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Starting with sociodemographic variables, previous literature has revealed that age and social media use may be important in the context of misinformation (van der Linden, 2022).”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as van der Linden, 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847
Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model
Rakita, A., Nikolić, N., Mildner, M., Matiasek, J., & Elbe‐Bürger, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56847-4 · Cited by 8,234
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2998 · Cited by 4,160
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks
Braman, D., Kahan, D. M., Peters, E. M., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., & Mandel, G. N. (2012) · Scholarly Commons - George Washington University Law School (George Washington University) · Cited by 2,421
The spreading of misinformation online
Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113 · Cited by 2,407
Zarocostas, J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30461-x · Cited by 2,344
The COVID-19 social media infodemic
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5 · Cited by 2,313
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Tandoc, E. C. Jr et al. Defining ‘fake news’ a typology of scholarly definitions. Digit. J. 6, 137–153 (2018).
- Marsh, E. J. & Yang, B. W. in Misinformation and Mass Audiences (eds Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A., & Sheble, L) 15–34 (University of Texas Press, 2018).
- Roozenbeek, J. & van der Linden, S. Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 5, 1–10 (2019).
- Rathje, S et al. Meta-analysis reveals that accuracy nudges have little to no effect for US conservatives: Regarding Pennycook et al. (2020). Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.25384/SAGE.12594110.v2 (2021). · DOI
- Kahan, D. M. in Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral sciences (eds Scott, R. & Kosslyn, S.) 1–16 (John Wiley & Sons, 2016).
- Papageorgis, D. & McGuire, W. J. The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 62, 475–481 (1961).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological Inoculation against Misinformation: Current Evidence and Future Directions
Traberg, C. S., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162221087936 · Cited by 224
Combating misinformation in the age of LLMs: Opportunities and challenges
Chen, C., & Shu, K. (2024) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12188 · Cited by 148
Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook
Allen, J. N. L., Watts, D. J., & Rand, D. G. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adk3451 · Cited by 173
A systematic review of communication interventions for countering vaccine misinformation
Whitehead, H. S., French, C. E., Caldwell, D. M., Letley, L. H., & Mounier‐Jack, S. (2023) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.059 · Cited by 155
Roozenbeek, J., Culloty, E., & Suiter, J. (2023) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000492 · Cited by 151
Conspiracy theories and social media platforms
Cinelli, M., Etta, G., Avalle, M., Quattrociocchi, A., Marco, N. D., Valensise, C. M., Galeazzi, A., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101407 · Cited by 147
Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis)information
Rathje, S., Roozenbeek, J., Bavel, J. J. V., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01540-w · Cited by 150
Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Herzog, S. M., Geers, M., Kurvers, R. H. J. M., Sultan, M., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003570 · Cited by 106
Social media behavior is associated with vaccine hesitancy
Rathje, S., He, J. K., Roozenbeek, J., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac207 · Cited by 100
Lu, C. F., Hu, B., Li, Q., Bi, C., & Ju, X. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/49255 · Cited by 112
Psychological inoculation protects against the social media infodemic
McPhedran, R., Ratajczak, M., Mawby, M., King, E., Yang, Y., & Gold, N. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32962-1 · Cited by 104
Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation
Roozenbeek, J., Traberg, C. S., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211719 · Cited by 89
Misinformation exploits outrage to spread online
McLoughlin, K. L., Brady, W. J., Goolsbee, A., Kaiser, B., Klonick, K., & Crockett, M. J. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adl2829 · Cited by 106
AI chatbots and (mis)information in public health: impact on vulnerable communities.
Meyrowitsch, D. W., Jensen, A. K., Sørensen, J. B., & Varga, T. V. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1226776 · Cited by 73
Information Avoidance: Past Perspectives and Future Directions
Foust, J. L., & Taber, J. M. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231197668 · Cited by 85
Psychological benefits of believing conspiracy theories
van Prooijen, J. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101352 · Cited by 70
Blair, R. A., Gottlieb, J., Nyhan, B., Paler, L., Argote, P., & Stainfield, C. J. (2023) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101732 · Cited by 69
Updating the identity-based model of belief: From false belief to the spread of misinformation
Bavel, J. J. V., Rathje, S., Vlasceanu, M., & Pretus, C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101787 · Cited by 76
Tomassi, A., Falegnami, A., & Romano, E. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0303183 · Cited by 88
Yuan, Y., Han, C. X., Guo, L., Wu, X., & Zhao, Y. (2024) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d3ta07658j · Cited by 55
Ezeudoka, B. C., & Fan, M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03457-9 · Cited by 54
The (Mis)Information Game: A social media simulator
Butler, L. H., Lamont, P. X., Wan, D. L. Y., Prike, T., Nasim, M., Walker, B., Fay, N., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02153-x · Cited by 48
MEGA: Machine Learning-Enhanced Graph Analytics for Infodemic Risk Management
Hang, C. N., Yu, P.-D., Chen, S., Tan, C. W., & Chen, G. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2023.3314632 · Cited by 51
RetractedCountering misinformation through psychological inoculation
van der Linden, S. (2023) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2023.11.001 · Cited by 51
Meppelink, C. S., Bos, L., Boukes, M., & Möller, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2022.2153288 · Cited by 42
Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Analysis of Statin-Related Topics and Sentiments on Social Media
Somani, S. S., van Buchem, M. M., Sarraju, A., Hernandez‐Boussard, T., & Rodríguez, F. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9747 · Cited by 45
Psychological Underpinnings of Misinformation Countermeasures
Ziemer, C., & Rothmund, T. (2024) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000407 · Cited by 41
The Future of Infodemic Surveillance as Public Health Surveillance
Chiou, H., Voegeli, C., Wilhelm, E., Kolis, J., Brookmeyer, K. A., & Prybylski, D. (2022) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2813.220696 · Cited by 41
Lin, F., Chen, X., & Cheng, E. W. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103013 · Cited by 35
Robust Domain Misinformation Detection via Multi-Modal Feature Alignment
Liu, H., Wang, W., Sun, H., Rocha, A. D. R., & Li, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3326368 · Cited by 41
Misinformation detection on online social networks using pretrained language models
Ahmad, P. N., Shah, A. M., Lee, K. Y., & Muhammad, W. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104342 · Cited by 47
Public agreement with misinformation about wind farms
Winter, K., Hornsey, M. J., Pummerer, L., & Sassenberg, K. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53278-2 · Cited by 50
Escaping the neutralization effect of modality features fusion in multimodal Fake News Detection
Wang, B., Li, X., Li, C., Wang, S., & Gao, W. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102500 · Cited by 39
Omar, M., Sorin, V., Wieler, L. H., Charney, A. W., Kovatch, P., Horowitz, C. R., Korfiatis, P. D., Glicksberg, B. S., Freeman, R., Nadkarni, G. N., et al. (2026) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.landig.2025.100949 · Cited by 37
Can Media Literacy Intervention Improve Fake News Credibility Assessment? A Meta-Analysis
Lu, C. F., Hu, B., Bao, M.-M., Wang, C., Bi, C., & Ju, X. (2024) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2023.0324 · Cited by 58
Inoculation against conspiracy theories: A consumer side approach to India's fake news problem
Iyengar, A., Gupta, P., & Priya, N. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3995 · Cited by 37
Fazio, L. K., Rand, D. G., Lewandowsky, S., Susmann, M. W., Berinsky, A. J., Guess, A. M., Kendeou, P., Lyons, B. A., Miller, J. M., Newman, E. J., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uyjha · Cited by 38
Ryan, C. G., Karran, E. L., Wallwork, S. B., Pate, J. W., O’Keeffe, M., Fullen, B. M., Livadas, N., Jones, N., Toumbourou, J. W., Gilchrist, P. N., et al. (2023) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.024 · Cited by 39
The moral psychology of misinformation: Why we excuse dishonesty in a post-truth world
Effron, D. A., & Helgason, B. A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101375 · Cited by 41
Tackling misinformation with games: a systematic literature review
Kiili, K. J. M., Siuko, J., & Ninaus, M. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2299999 · Cited by 57
“Fact-checking” fact checkers: A data-driven approach
Lee, S., Xiong, A., Seo, H., & Lee, D. (2023) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-126 · Cited by 44
Bizzotto, N., de Bruijn, G., & Schulz, P. J. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16404-1 · Cited by 33
Social Media Misinformation about Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review
Malik, M., Bauer-Maison, N., Guarna, G., & D'Souza, R. D. (2024) · Medical Principles and Practice · doi:10.1159/000538346 · Cited by 34
Missing Counter-Evidence Renders NLP Fact-Checking Unrealistic for Misinformation
Glockner, M., Hou, Y., & Gurevych, I. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.397 · Cited by 52
Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Ni, Z., & Liu, Z. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108136 · Cited by 31
Considerations for mRNA Product Development, Regulation and Deployment Across the Lifecycle
Skerritt, J. H. (2025) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines13050473 · Cited by 31
van der Linden, S., Albarracín, D., Fazio, L. K., Freelon, D., Roozenbeek, J., Swire‐Thompson, B., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2023) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e506432023-001 · Cited by 34
“Inoculation” to Resist Misinformation
van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2024) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2024.5026 · Cited by 27
Debunking Three Myths About Misinformation
Gawronski, B., Nahon, L. S., & Ng, N. L. (2024) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214241280907 · Cited by 27
Faragó, L., Krekó, P., & Orosz, G. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26724-8 · Cited by 40
Thakur, N., Cui, S., Knieling, V., Khanna, K., & Shao, M. (2024) · Computation · doi:10.3390/computation12020028 · Cited by 27
What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review
Zhang, Y., Gaggiano, J. D., Yongsatianchot, N., Suhaimi, N. M., Kim, M., Sun, Y., Griffin, J., & Parker, A. G. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581019 · Cited by 29
An attention economic perspective on the future of the information age
Vettehen, P. H., & Schaap, G. (2023) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2023.103243 · Cited by 26
Gamified Inoculation Against Misinformation in India: A Randomized Control Trial
Harjani, T., Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Journal of Trial and Error · doi:10.36850/e12 · Cited by 34
D’Errico, F., Cicirelli, P. G., Corbelli, G., & Paciello, M. (2023) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-023-09777-z · Cited by 26
The Misinformation Receptivity Framework
Zmigrod, L., Burnell, R., & Hameleers, M. (2023) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000498 · Cited by 33
Emotional content and sharing on Facebook: A theory cage match
Paletz, S. B. F., Johns, M., Murauskaitė, E., Golonka, E., Pandža, N. B., Rytting, C. A., Buntain, C., & Ellis, D. H. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade9231 · Cited by 32
Accuracy and Social Motivations Shape Judgements of (Mis)InformationPreprint
Rathje, S., Roozenbeek, J., Bavel, J. J. V., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hkqyv · Cited by 26
Neylan, J., Biddlestone, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43885-2 · Cited by 33
The Online Misinformation Engagement Framework
Geers, M., Swire‐Thompson, B., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Herzog, S. M., Kozyreva, A., & Hertwig, R. (2023) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101739 · Cited by 36
On the Efficacy of Accuracy Prompts Across Partisan Lines: An Adversarial Collaboration
Martel, C., Rathje, S., Clark, C. J., Pennycook, G., Bavel, J. J. V., Rand, D. G., & van der Linden, S. (2024) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976241232905 · Cited by 34
A broader view of misinformation reveals potential for intervention
van der Linden, S., & Kyrychenko, Y. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adp9117 · Cited by 28
Children's susceptibility to online misinformation
Shtulman, A. (2023) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101753 · Cited by 26
Kotz, J., Giese, H., & König, L. M. (2023) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12670 · Cited by 27
Daunt, K. L., Greer, D. A., Jin, H. S., & Orpen, I. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-07-2022-0565 · Cited by 33
Ballara, N. B. (2023) · International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews · doi:10.55248/gengpi.4.723.51227 · Cited by 22
Kruijt, J., Meppelink, C. S., & Vandeberg, L. (2022) · European Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.47368/ejhc.2022.203 · Cited by 29
Scales, D. A., Gorman, J. M., DiCaprio, P., Hurth, L., Radhakrishnan, M., Windham, S., Akunne, A., Florman, J., Leininger, L. J., & Starks, T. J. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107609 · Cited by 22
Tan, C. W., & Yu, P.-D. (2023) · Foundations and Trends® in Networking · doi:10.1561/1300000068 · Cited by 24
Većkalov, B., Gligorić, V., & Petrović, M. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104549 · Cited by 14
Prevalence of long COVID decreases for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake
Domenico, M. D. (2023) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001917 · Cited by 22
Insight in the Conspiracist’s Mind
de Cruys, S. V., Bervoets, J., Gadsby, S., Gijbels, D., & Poels, K. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683231203145 · Cited by 22
The Misleading count: an identity-based intervention to counter partisan misinformation sharing
Pretus, C., Javeed, A. M., Hughes, D., Hackenburg, K., Tsakiris, M., Vilarroya, O., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0040 · Cited by 35
A Survey of Information Dissemination Model, Datasets, and Insight
Liu, Y., Zhang, P., Shi, L., & Gong, J. (2023) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math11173707 · Cited by 26
Barbieri, V., Wiedermann, C., Lombardo, S., Piccoliori, G., Gärtner, T., & Engl, A. (2024) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines12020176 · Cited by 20
Ensemble machine learning approaches for fake news classification
Padalko, H., Chomko, V., Yakovlev, S., & Chumachenko, D. (2023) · RADIOELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS · doi:10.32620/reks.2023.4.01 · Cited by 18
Using Agent-Based Modelling to Evaluate the Impact of Algorithmic Curation on Social Media
Gausen, A., Luk, W. W., & Guo, C. (2022) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3546915 · Cited by 20
Filipinos’ COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy comments in TikTok videos: A manifest content analysis
Berdida, D. J. E., Franco, F. M. C., Santos, X. A. G., Dacol, C. B., Dimaano, M., Rosario, E. S. D., & Lantin, C. C. (2022) · Public Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/phn.13143 · Cited by 18
Ruani, M. A., & Reiss, M. J. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15020451 · Cited by 22
Debunking nutrition myths: An experimental test of the ‘truth sandwich’ text format
König, L. M. (2023) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12665 · Cited by 17
Fan, C., Wang, X., & Yu, G. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-07-2022-0497 · Cited by 18
Dynamics and characteristics of misinformation related to earthquake predictions on Twitter
Dallo, I., Elroy, O., Fallou, L., Komendantova, N., & Yosipof, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-40399-9 · Cited by 23
Rozenblum, Y., Dalyot, K., & Baram‐Tsabari, A. (2024) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21975 · Cited by 22
Left–right political orientations are not systematically related to conspiracism
Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Littrell, S., Miller, J. M., Theocharis, Y., Uscinski, J. E., & Zilinsky, J. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13017 · Cited by 18
A Unified Framework for Understanding and Intervening on False News SharingPreprint
Gollwitzer, A., Tump, A. N., Martel, C., Deffner, D., Sultan, M., Kurvers, R. H. J. M., & Hertwig, R. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pxn29 · Cited by 19
Lazebnik, T., Bunimovich‐Mendrazitsky, S., Ashkenazi, S., Levner, E., & Benis, A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192316023 · Cited by 17
Habib, G., Yousuf, H., Bredius, L., Bindraban, N. R., Winter, M. M., Scherder, E., van der Linden, S., Narula, J., & Hofstra, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27910-y · Cited by 17
Cook, J., Lepage, C., Hopkins, K. L., Cook, W., Kolog, E. A., Thomson, A., Iddrisu, I., & Burnette, S. (2024) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2024.2407204 · Cited by 17
The psychology of science rejection
Rutjens, B. T., & Hornsey, M. J. (2024) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.10.002 · Cited by 18
Enyinnaya, J. C., Anderson, A. A., Kelp, N., Long, M., & Duncan, C. (2024) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.001 · Cited by 16
Exploring pre-service teachers’ generative AI readiness and behavioral intentions
Bui, P., Korhonen, T., Kontkanen, S., Karme, S., Piispa-Hakala, S., & Veermans, M. (2025) · LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education · doi:10.31129/lumat.13.1.2755 · Cited by 28
A comparison of misinformation feature effectiveness across issues and time on Chinese social media
Ji, J., Zhu, Y., & Chao, N. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103210 · Cited by 21
Facilitating system-level behavioural climate action using computational social science
Debnath, R., van der Linden, S., Alvarez, R. M., & Sovacool, B. K. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01527-7 · Cited by 15
Markant, D. B., Rogha, M., Karduni, A., Wesslen, R. S., & Wenwen Dou, A. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581330 · Cited by 16
Impact of misinformation in the evolution of collective cooperation on networks
Meng, Y., Broom, M., & Li, A. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2023.0295 · Cited by 18
Combatting Climate Disinformation: Comparing the Effectiveness of Correction Placement and Type
Christner, C., Merz, P., Barkela, B., Jungkunst, H. F., & von Sikorski, C. (2024) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2024.2316757 · Cited by 19
Diverse misinformation: impacts of human biases on detection of deepfakes on networks
Lovato, J., St-Onge, J., Harp, R., Salazar Lopez, G., Rogers, S. P., Haq, I. U., Hébert-Dufresne, L., & Onaolapo, J. (2024) · npj Complexity · doi:10.1038/s44260-024-00006-y · Cited by 16
Zhou, Q., Duan, X., & Yu, G. (2025) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116498 · Cited by 15
Learning about informal fallacies and the detection of fake news: An experimental intervention
Hruschka, T. M. J., & Appel, M. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283238 · Cited by 16
Zheng, H., Wang, X., & Huang, Y. C. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107790 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Linden, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- van der Linden, Sander
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 460-467
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- OpenAlex
- W4220844191
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 106 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 47
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- misinformation, infodemic, misinformation susceptibility, misinformation spread, social networking sites, psychological immunity, misinformation interventions, vaccine uptake, public health recommendations, pandemic response
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Communication, Humans, Pandemics, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review