Cited by 26Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Medical imaging data science competitions should report dataset demographics and evaluate for bias

Garin, Sean P., Parekh, Vishwa S., Sulam, Jeremias, Yi, Paul H.·2023·Nature Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-023-02264-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 26

Authors
Garin, S. P., Parekh, V. S., Sulam, J., & Yi, P. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Yi, Paul H.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2023-04-03
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
1038-1039
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4362523852
Cited by
26
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
algorithmic bias, dataset documentation, bias assessment
MeSH terms
Data Science, Demography, Diagnostic Imaging, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review