Cited by 109Renal cell carcinoma treatmentCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Cabozantinib and nivolumab with or without live bacterial supplementation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 1 trial

Open access
Ebrahimi, Hedyeh, Dizman, Nazli, Meza, Luis, Malhotra, Jasnoor, Li, Xiaochen, Dorff, Tanya, Frankel, Paul, Llamas-Quitiquit, Marian +21 more·2024·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Supplementation with CBM588, a bifidogenic live bacterial product, has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in persons with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab. However, its effect on those receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based combinations is unknown. In this open-label, randomized, investigator-initiated, phase 1 study, 30 participants with locally advanced or mRCC with histological confirmation of clear cell, papillary or sarcomatoid component were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to receive cabozantinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, MET and AXL) and nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1) with or without CBM588 as first-line treatment. Metagenomic sequencing was performed on stool samples to characterize their gut microbiome at baseline and 13 weeks into treatment. The primary endpoint was a change in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp.; secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity profile. The primary endpoint of the study was not met and the addition of CBM588 to cabozantinib and nivolumab did not result in a difference in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. or alpha diversity (as measured by the Shannon index). However, ORR was significantly higher in participants treated with CBM588 compared to those in the control arm (14 of 19, 74% versus 2 of 10, 20%; P = 0.01). PFS at 6 months was 84% (16 of 19) and 60% (6 of 10) in the experimental and control arms, respectively. No significant difference in toxicity profile was seen between the study arms. Our results provide a preliminary signal of improved clinical activity with CBM588 in treatment-naive participants with mRCC receiving cabozantinib and nivolumab. Further investigation is needed to confirm these findings and better characterize the underlying mechanism driving this effect. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05122546

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-024-03086-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBM588 supplementation was associated with increased abundance of Ruminococcaceae, which has been linked to ICB response and metabolomic changes.

    “Interestingly, CBM588 supplementation was associated with increased abundance of Ruminococcaceae, which has been linked to ICB response and metabolomic changes (Ebrahimi et al., 2024).”

    From Microbiota-centered interventions to boost immune checkpoint blockade therapies (2025) · cites this paper as Ebrahimi et al., 2024

  • Supplementation with CBM588 improved the overall response rate (74% versus 20%) and the 6-month PFS rate (84% versus 60%).

    “Ebrahimi et al. (2024) found that supplementation with CBM588 improved the overall response rate (74% versus 20%) and the 6-month PFS rate (84% versus 60%).”

    From Microbiota-centered interventions to boost immune checkpoint blockade therapies (2025) · cites this paper as Ebrahimi et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 109

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Govindarajan, A. et al. Front-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a perspective on the current algorithm and future directions. Cancers (Basel) 14, 2049 (2022).
  2. Navani, V. et al. CABOSEQ: the effectiveness of cabozantinib in patients with treatment refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma: results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC). Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 21, 106 (2023).
  3. Hagihara, M. et al. Clostridium butyricum enhances colonization resistance against Clostridioides difficile by metabolic and immune modulation. Sci. Rep. 11, 15007 (2021).
  4. Tomita, Y. et al. Association of Clostridium butyricum therapy using the live bacterial product CBM588 with the survival of patients with lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy combinations. Cancers (Basel) 16, 47 (2024).
  5. Ren, L., Peng, C., Hu, X., Han, Y. & Huang, H. Microbial production of vitamin K2: current status and future prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 39, 107453 (2020).
  6. Xv, F., Chen, J., Duan, L. & Li, S. Research progress on the anticancer effects of vitamin K2 (review). Oncol. Lett. 15, 8926-8934 (2018).
  7. Chehrazi-Raffle, A. et al. Circulating cytokines associated with clinical response to systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 9, e002009 (2021).
  8. Lin, H. & Peddada, S. D. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun. 11, 3514 (2020).

Authors
Ebrahimi, H., Dizman, N., Meza, L., Malhotra, J., Li, X., Dorff, T., Frankel, P., Llamas-Quitiquit, M., Hsu, J., Zengin, Z. B., Alcantara, M., Castro, D., Mercier, B., Chawla, N., Chehrazi-Raffle, A., Barragan-Carrillo, R., Jaime-Casas, S., Govindarajan, A., Gillece, J., Trent, J., Lee, P. P., Parks, T. P., Takahashi, M., Hayashi, A., Kortylewski, M., Caporaso, J. G., Lee, K., Tripathi, A., & Pal, S. K.
Affiliations
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • Osel (United States) (US)
  • Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Tripathi, Abhishek
  • Pal, Sumanta K.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2024-06-28
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
2576-2585
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4400126503
Cited by
109
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 12
FWCI
31.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Exelixis
  • National Cancer Institute (U24CA248454)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
cabozantinib, nivolumab, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, gut microbiota, Bifidobacterium, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, first-line therapy, objective response rate, progression-free survival, alpha diversity
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Nivolumab, Progression-Free Survival, Adult, Aged, Anilides, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Female, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Pyridines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review