Molecular predictors of minimal residual disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with quadruplet therapy
Open accessAbstract
Quadruplet therapy, combining anti-CD38 antibodies, immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors and dexamethasone, is now the standard induction treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, treatment response is heterogeneous and molecular predictors are needed to guide early therapeutic decisions. We performed integrated genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling of 423 tumor samples from patients with NDMM from the MIDAS cohort to characterize molecular heterogeneity and its association with measurable residual disease (MRD) after quadruplet induction with isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd). Postinduction MRD-negativity rates varied significantly across gene expression subtypes, with HP1/HP3 and MS groups showing superior responses compared to the MF and CD2 subtypes. B cell differentiation was associated with MRD positivity, while proliferation and MYC programs were associated with MRD negativity. These MRD-associated transcriptomic features were independently validated in the CASSIOPEIA cohort. Whole-genome sequencing revealed both known (APOBEC mutagenesis, chromothripsis) and new genomic instability phenotypes validated in the MMRF cohort. New driver alterations were identified with independent validation across three external cohorts with multiple myeloma (MMRF, MANHATTAN and CASSIOPEIA; 1,451 cases). Genomic instability features and driver genes such as CCND1 and MYC correlated with differential MRD outcomes. DNA methylation profiling identified nine MRD-linked subgroups distinguished by the extent of hypomethylation in quiescent chromatin and cis/trans signatures of driver translocations. A multimodal random forest model integrating genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic features predicted MRD status after induction, with an area under the curve of 0.77, outperforming clinical and genomic models, while providing comparable discrimination and improved calibration relative to the transcriptomic and epigenomic models. These findings define a multiomic classification of NDMM linked to Isa-KRd response. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04934475 .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma
Bolli, N., Avet-Loiseau, H., Wedge, D. C., Van Loo, P., Alexandrov, L. B., Martincorena, I., Dawson, K. J., Iorio, F., Nik-Zainal, S., Bignell, G. R., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3997 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Self-citationDisease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data
Frazer, J., Notin, P., Dias, M., Gomez, A., Min, J. K., Brock, K., Gal, Y., & Marks, D. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
DNA methylation loss in late-replicating domains is linked to mitotic cell division
Zhou, W., Dinh, H. Q., Ramjan, Z., Weisenberger, D. J., Nicolet, C. M., Shen, H., Laird, P. W., & Berman, B. P. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0073-4 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Walker, B. A., Wardell, C. P., Murison, A., Boyle, E. M., Begum, D. B., Dahir, N. M., Proszek, P. Z., Melchor, L., Pawlyn, C., Kaiser, M. F., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7997 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Magrangeas, F., Cherkaoui, M., Bessonneau-Gaborit, V., Derrien, J., Chevalier, C., Guérin-Charbonnel, C., Diamond, B., Samur, M. K., (IFM), I. F. D. M., Hulin, C., Caillot, D., Karlin, L., Arnulf, B., Landgren, O., Munshi, N. C., Avet-Loiseau, H., Martinet, L., Corre, J., Perrot, A., Moreau, P., Touzeau, C., Minvielle, S., & Letouzé, E.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Miami (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Université Paris Cité (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Minvielle, Stéphane
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2026-10-19
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- OpenAlex
- W7222985380
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Amgen
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sanofi
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-IDEX-0007)
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INCa-DGOS-INSERM-ITMO Cancer_18011)
- Institut National Du Cancer (Cancer_18011, INCa-DGOS-Inserm-ITMOCancer_18011)
- Direction Générale de l’offre de Soins
- Conseil Régional des Pays de la Loire
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Keywords
- minimal residual disease, quadruple therapy, isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, gene expression subtypes, genomic instability, APOBEC mutagenesis, chromothripsis, c-Myc, CCND1, DNA methylation, treatment response prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review