Cited by 75Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Simultaneous multiplexed amplicon sequencing and transcriptome profiling in single cells

Open access
Saikia, Mridusmita, Burnham, Philip, Keshavjee, Sara H., Wang, Michael F. Z., Heyang, Michael, Moral-Lopez, Pablo, Hinchman, Meleana M., Danko, Charles G. +2 more·2019·Nature Methods

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We describe droplet-assisted RNA targeting by single-cell sequencing (DART-seq), a versatile technology that enables multiplexed amplicon sequencing and transcriptome profiling in single cells. We applied DART-seq to simultaneously characterize the non-A-tailed transcripts of a segmented dsRNA virus and the transcriptome of the infected cell. In addition, we used DART-seq to simultaneously determine the natively paired, variable region heavy and light chain amplicons and the transcriptome of B lymphocytes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-018-0259-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior enrichment methods based on multiplexed PCR, custom RT beads, or linear amplification each have constraints on target number, quality, or the need to choose genes beforehand.

    “Diverse approaches exist for enriching transcripts using multiplexed PCR34, custom RT beads35, or linear amplification36; however, each of these is limited by number of target genes, quality, and/or a priori gene selection.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 75

Authors
Saikia, M., Burnham, P., Keshavjee, S. H., Wang, M. F. Z., Heyang, M., Moral-Lopez, P., Hinchman, M. M., Danko, C. G., Parker, J. S. L., & De Vlaminck, I.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2018-12-17
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
59-62
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2949430636
Cited by
75
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1144153)
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2ai138242-01, DGE-1144153)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DP2 AI138242, R21AI144557)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
DArTseq, single-cell transcriptomics, viral transcriptome, B cells, single-cell RNA sequencing
MeSH terms
Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Cell Line, Gene Expression Profiling, Reverse Transcription, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review