The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) single-particle analysis has proven powerful in determining the structures of rigid macromolecules. However, many imaged protein complexes exhibit conformational and compositional heterogeneity that poses a major challenge to existing three-dimensional reconstruction methods. Here, we present cryoDRGN, an algorithm that leverages the representation power of deep neural networks to directly reconstruct continuous distributions of 3D density maps and map per-particle heterogeneity of single-particle cryo-EM datasets. Using cryoDRGN, we uncovered residual heterogeneity in high-resolution datasets of the 80S ribosome and the RAG complex, revealed a new structural state of the assembling 50S ribosome, and visualized large-scale continuous motions of a spliceosome complex. CryoDRGN contains interactive tools to visualize a dataset’s distribution of per-particle variability, generate density maps for exploratory analysis, extract particle subsets for use with other tools and generate trajectories to visualize molecular motions. CryoDRGN is open-source software freely available at http://cryodrgn.csail.mit.edu. CryoDRGN is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that reconstructs continuous distributions of three-dimensional density maps from heterogeneous single-particle cryo-EM data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., & Großberger, L. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00861 · Cited by 9,826
Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation
Wrapp, D., Wang, N., Corbett, K. S., Goldsmith, J. A., Hsieh, C.-L., Abiona, O., Graham, B. S., & McLellan, J. S. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2507 · Cited by 8,897
Rosenthal, P. B., & Henderson, R. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013 · Cited by 2,416
Cited by
A guide to machine learning for biologists
Greener, J. G., Kandathil, S. M., Moffat, L., & Jones, D. T. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00407-0 · Cited by 2,127
Protein structure prediction has reached the single-structure frontier
Lane, T. J. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01760-4 · Cited by 125
Structural basis for membrane attack complex inhibition by CD59
Couves, E. C., Gardner, S., Voisin, T. B., Bickel, J. K., Stansfeld, P. J., Tate, E. W., & Bubeck, D. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36441-z · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Berger, B., & Davis, J. H.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 176-185
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W3127326657
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 39.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41592-020-01049-4
- The paper
- Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Berger, B., & Davis, J. H. (2021). CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01049-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.