Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 632

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Philosopher: a versatile toolkit for shotgun proteomics data analysis

Open access
da Veiga Leprevost, Felipe, Haynes, Sarah E., Avtonomov, Dmitry M., Chang, Hui-Yin, Shanmugam, Avinash K., Mellacheruvu, Dattatreya, Kong, Andy T., Nesvizhskii, Alexey I.·2020·Nature Methods

Abstract

To the Editor — Here we introduce Philosopher (https://philosopher.nesvilab. org), a free, open-source, versatile and robust data analysis toolkit designed to bring easy access to a powerful and comprehensive set of computational tools for shotgun proteomics data analysis. Computational analysis is a central component of any modern experiment, and mass-spectrometry-based proteomics is no exception. As technologies continue to rapidly advance with respect to throughput and sensitivity, bioinformatics tools must keep pace with large-scale experiments. While existing proteomics tools such as the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline (TPP)1, MaxQuant2 and PeptideShaker3 are capable of performing high-quality analyses, all require installation and depend on specific operating systems, libraries and other software. Managing these tools can be a daunting task, even for research groups with substantial bioinformatics expertise. This is particularly true when experiments demand high-performance configurations such as GNU/Linux clusters or cloud computing. To address this challenge, we initially built and deployed Docker containers with different applications for proteomics, which in part inspired the creation of the BioContainers resource for different bioinformatics fields4. Though this method was efficient for packing and sharing resources, we found that chaining different applications with custom implementation of established algorithms in a transparent and dependency-free way was still a challenge for containerization. The Philosopher toolkit integrates high-performance algorithms and existing tools (Fig. 1) and is a dependency-free, fast and comprehensive proteomics pipeline, able to rapidly process even the most complex proteomics datasets with efficient resource management. Philosopher includes the database search engine Comet and can use the high-performance search engine MSFragger5 as a separately downloaded tool. For downstream processing of peptide– spectrum matches (PSMs), Philosopher includes key components of TPP. In addition, it implements best practices for false discovery rate (FDR) filtering and data summarization that are not readily available within the TPP, such as picked FDR, two-dimensional or sequential (at PSM and protein levels) filters, and additional options for dealing with peptides whose sequence is present in multiple proteins (for example, the razor peptide approach). As quantification is frequently the goal of modern proteomics experiments, Philosopher includes algorithms for both label-free quantification and isobaric label-based quantification (TMT or iTRAQ). Precursor spectral intensities are retrieved following a method described previously6. Protein-level quantification is estimated using the sum of the three most intense supporting ions. Alternatively, Philosopher can use TMT-Integrator (http://tmt-integrator.nesvilab.org/) as an external tool or output files can be used with downstream quantification and statistical tools such as MSstats7. The rich reports generated by Philosopher are also compatible with other software such as PDV for visualization of peptide assignments to tandem mass spectra8 and CRAPome and REPRINT (https://reprint-apms. org/) for interactome scoring and network

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-020-0912-y

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 632

Metadata

Authors
da Veiga Leprevost, F., Haynes, S. E., Avtonomov, D. M., Chang, H.-Y., Shanmugam, A. K., Mellacheruvu, D., Kong, A. T., & Nesvizhskii, A. I.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2020-07-15
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
869-870
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W3043316508
Cited by
632
References
10
FWCI
18.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM-094231)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (U24-CA210967)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Philosopher: a versatile toolkit for shotgun proteomics data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41592-020-0912-y
The paper
da Veiga Leprevost, F., Haynes, S. E., Avtonomov, D. M., Chang, H.-Y., Shanmugam, A. K., Mellacheruvu, D., Kong, A. T., & Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2020). Philosopher: a versatile toolkit for shotgun proteomics data analysis. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0912-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.