Cited by 374Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyTryptophan and brain disorders

Maternal IL-6 during pregnancy can be estimated from newborn brain connectivity and predicts future working memory in offspring

Open access
Rudolph, Marc D., Graham, Alice M., Feczko, Eric, Miranda-Dominguez, Oscar, Rasmussen, Jerod M., Nardos, Rahel, Entringer, Sonja, Wadhwa, Pathik D. +2 more·2018·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Several lines of evidence support the link between maternal inflammation during pregnancy and increased likelihood of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in offspring. This longitudinal study seeks to advance understanding regarding implications of systemic maternal inflammation during pregnancy, indexed by plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations, for large-scale brain system development and emerging executive function skills in offspring. We assessed maternal IL-6 during pregnancy, functional magnetic resonance imaging acquired in neonates, and working memory (an important component of executive function) at 2 years of age. Functional connectivity within and between multiple neonatal brain networks can be modeled to estimate maternal IL-6 concentrations during pregnancy. Brain regions heavily weighted in these models overlap substantially with those supporting working memory in a large meta-analysis. Maternal IL-6 also directly accounts for a portion of the variance of working memory at 2 years of age. Findings highlight the association of maternal inflammation during pregnancy with the developing functional architecture of the brain and emerging executive function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-018-0128-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a relationship between maternal Interleukin-6 concentration during pregnancy and altered newborn brain structure and functional connectivity.

    “The literature points to a relationship between maternal Interleukin-6 concentration during pregnancy and altered newborn brain structure and functional connectivity [140, 141].”

    From Brain structural and functional outcomes in the offspring of women experiencing psychological distress during pregnancy (2024) · cites this paper as [141]

    The Results report significant associations between maternal IL-6 concentrations during pregnancy and newborn functional brain connectivity. The paper does not report an association with altered newborn brain structure; its anatomical images were used to process the functional imaging data (Methods: MRI and fMRI data preprocessing; page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 374

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [57]Talairach P Tournoux J Co-planar Stereotaxic Altas of the Human Brain Georg Thieme Verlag 1988

Authors
Rudolph, M. D., Graham, A. M., Feczko, E., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Rasmussen, J. M., Nardos, R., Entringer, S., Wadhwa, P. D., Buss, C., & Fair, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Buss, Claudia
  • Fair, Damien A.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2018-04-09
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
765-772
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2797215799
Cited by
374
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 15
FWCI
25.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001414)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH105283, K99MH091238, R01MH115357, R01MH091351, K99MH111805, R00MH091238, R01MH096773, R00MH111805, R01MH105538)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007088)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
working memory, executive function, offspring neurodevelopment, neurodevelopmental disorders, prenatal inflammation
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Brain, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Psychomotor Performance, Interleukin-6, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review