Human microglia regional heterogeneity and phenotypes determined by multiplexed single-cell mass cytometry
Open accessAbstract
Microglia, the specialized innate immune cells of the CNS, play crucial roles in neural development and function. Different phenotypes and functions have been ascribed to rodent microglia, but little is known about human microglia (huMG) heterogeneity. Difficulties in procuring huMG and their susceptibility to cryopreservation damage have limited large-scale studies. Here we applied multiplexed mass cytometry for a comprehensive characterization of postmortem huMG (10 3 - 10 4 cells). We determined expression levels of 57 markers on huMG isolated from up to five different brain regions of nine donors. We identified the phenotypic signature of huMG, which was distinct from peripheral myeloid cells but was comparable to fresh huMG. We detected microglia regional heterogeneity using a hybrid workflow combining Cytobank and R/Bioconductor for multidimensional data analysis. Together, these methodologies allowed us to perform high-dimensional, large-scale immunophenotyping of huMG at the single-cell level, which facilitates their unambiguous profiling in health and disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 436
- Authors
- NBB-Psy, Böttcher, C., Schlickeiser, S., Sneeboer, M. A. M., Kunkel, D., Knop, A., Paza, E., Fidzinski, P., Kraus, L., Snijders, G. J. L., Kahn, R. S., Schulz, A. R., Mei, H. E., Hol, E. M., Siegmund, B., Glauben, R., Spruth, E. J., de Witte, L. D., & Priller, J.
- Affiliations
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (DE)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- German Rheumatism Research Centre (DE)
- Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
- UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Böttcher, Chotima
- Priller, Josef
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2018-12-17
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-90
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2905335418
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 34
- FWCI
- 20.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Berlin Institute of Health
- Nature
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_16031)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Keywords
- human microglia, microglial heterogeneity, microglial phenotype, postmortem brain, myeloid differentiation, single-cell mass cytometry, immunophenotyping
- MeSH terms
- Mannose Receptor, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Receptors, Cell Surface, Immunophenotyping, Microglia, Myeloid Cells, Lectins, C-Type, Mannose-Binding Lectins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review