The central nucleus of the amygdala and the construction of defensive modes across the threat-imminence continuum
Abstract
In nature, animals display defensive behaviors that reflect the spatiotemporal distance of threats. Laboratory-based paradigms that elicit specific defensive responses in rodents have provided valuable insight into the brain mechanisms that mediate the construction of defensive modes with varying degrees of threat imminence. In this Review, we discuss accumulating evidence that the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) plays a key role in this process. Specifically, we propose that the mutually inhibitory circuits of the CeA use a winner-takes-all strategy that supports transitioning across defensive modes and the execution of specific defensive behaviors to previously formed threat associations. Our proposal provides a conceptual framework in which seemingly divergent observations regarding CeA function can be interpreted and identifies various areas of priority for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both the BLA and CeA are highly implicated in stress processing.
“Both the BLA and CeA are highly implicated in stress processing36,37.”
From A dual-pathway architecture for stress to disrupt agency and promote habit (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 139 · Cited by 112
- Authors
- Moscarello, J. M., & Penzo, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moscarello, Justin M.
- Penzo, Mario A.
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 999-1008
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W4289262037
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 139
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (1ZIAMH002950)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- central amygdala, defensive behavior, winner-take-all, threat appraisal
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Central Amygdaloid Nucleus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review