Cited by 0Extracellular vesicles in diseaseNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryCellular transport and secretion

Identification of candidate markers for the isolation of neuron-specific extracellular vesicles

Open access
Ter-Ovanesyan, Dmitry, Whiteman, Sara, Gilboa, Tal, Kowal, Emma J. K., Trieu, Wendy, Iyer, Siddharth, Budnik, Bogdan, Babila, Clarissa May +9 more·2026·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are present in biofluids and may be useful biomarkers to non-invasively monitor brain cells, but isolating cell type-specific EVs remains challenging. Here we introduce an approach to immuno-isolate EVs from neurons and glia based on protein surface markers. We first selected transmembrane proteins suitable as cell type-specific EV markers based on gene expression and EV proteomic data. We developed a high-purity EV isolation method and cataloged the proteins present on EVs in human cerebrospinal fluid and plasma. We then computationally identified cell type-specific candidate markers for isolating EVs from neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microglia. Using ultrasensitive immunoassays against several predicted neuron-specific proteins, we confirmed one marker, NRXN3, as present on EVs in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma. Finally, we developed efficient EV immuno-isolation methods and applied them to isolate NRXN3 + EVs. Our work provides a general methodology for the isolation of cell type-specific EVs, advancing the goal of using EVs to study brain diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-026-02466-y

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ter-Ovanesyan, D., Whiteman, S., Gilboa, T., Kowal, E. J. K., Trieu, W., Iyer, S., Budnik, B., Babila, C. M., Han, C., Vance, D., Heimberg, G., Burgess, M. W., Keshishian, H., Carr, S. A., Regev, A., Church, G. M., & Walt, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering (US)
  • Genentech (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Regev, Aviv
  • Church, George M.
  • Walt, David R.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2026-10-23
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W7223400515
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Open Philanthropy Project
  • Good Ventures Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
extracellular vesicles, cell surface markers, NRXN3, cerebrospinal fluid, plasma, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, EV proteome, transmembrane proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review