Cited by 23Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Molecular basis of Gabija anti-phage supramolecular assemblies

Open access
Yang, Xiao-Yuan, Shen, Zhangfei, Xie, Jiale, Greenwald, Jacelyn, Marathe, Ila, Lin, Qingpeng, Xie, Wen Jun, Wysocki, Vicki H. +1 more·2024·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

As one of the most prevalent anti-phage defense systems in prokaryotes, Gabija consists of a Gabija protein A (GajA) and a Gabija protein B (GajB). The assembly and function of the Gabija system remain unclear. Here we present cryo-EM structures of Bacillus cereus GajA and GajAB complex, revealing tetrameric and octameric assemblies, respectively. In the center of the complex, GajA assembles into a tetramer, which recruits two sets of GajB dimer at opposite sides of the complex, resulting in a 4:4 GajAB supramolecular complex for anti-phage defense. Further biochemical analysis showed that GajA alone is sufficient to cut double-stranded DNA and plasmid DNA, which can be inhibited by ATP. Unexpectedly, the GajAB displays enhanced activity for plasmid DNA, suggesting a role of substrate selection by GajB. Together, our study defines a framework for understanding anti-phage immune defense by the GajAB complex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41594-024-01283-w

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yang, X.-Y., Shen, Z., Xie, J., Greenwald, J., Marathe, I., Lin, Q., Xie, W. J., Wysocki, V. H., & Fu, T.-M.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Fu, Tian-Min
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2024-04-16
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1243-1250
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W4394855524
Cited by
23
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM 103310)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM103310, GM103310, R35GM147465)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
anti-phage defense, supramolecular self-assembly, Bacillus cereus, DNA double-strand breaks, plasmid DNA, ATP inhibition, protein complex stoichiometry, cryo-EM structure
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Bacillus cereus, Bacterial Proteins, Models, Molecular, Plasmids, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review