Extraction of nuclei from archived postmortem tissues for single-nucleus sequencing applications
Abstract
Single-cell and single-nucleus sequencing techniques are a burgeoning field with various biological, biomedical and clinical applications. Numerous high- and low-throughput methods have been developed for sequencing the RNA and DNA content of single cells. However, for all these methods, the key requirement is high-quality input of a single-cell or single-nucleus suspension. Preparing such a suspension is the limiting step when working with fragile, archived tissues of variable quality. This hurdle can prevent such tissues from being extensively investigated with single-cell technologies. We describe a protocol for preparing single-nucleus suspensions within the span of a few hours that reliably works for multiple postmortem and archived tissue types using standard laboratory equipment. The stages of the protocol include tissue preparation and dissociation, nuclei extraction, and nuclei concentration assessment and capture. The protocol is comparable to other published protocols but does not require fluorescence-assisted nuclei sorting (FANS) or ultracentrifugation. The protocol can be carried out by a competent graduate student familiar with basic laboratory techniques and equipment. Moreover, these preparations are compatible with single-nucleus (sn)RNA-seq and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin (ATAC)-seq using the 10X Genomics Chromium system. The protocol reliably results in efficient capture of single nuclei for high-quality snRNA-seq libraries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Use of nuclei enables study of postmortem, frozen, or biobank tissue, including neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease.
“Additionally, the use of nuclei, rather than whole cells, enables the study of samples that were previously difficult to analyze via scRNA-seq, such as postmortem, frozen, or biobank tissue, including those obtained from individuals with neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD)[12, 16].”
From Comparative analysis of nuclei isolation methods for brain single-nucleus RNA sequencing (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Maitra, M., Nagy, C., Chawla, A., Wang, Y. C., Nascimento, C., Suderman, M., Théroux, J.-F., Mechawar, N., Ragoussis, J., & Turecki, G.
- Affiliations
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre (CA)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Turecki, Gustavo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2021-05-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2788-2801
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W3107103270
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Government of Canada (EGM141899, FDN148374)
- Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/5)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- single-nucleus sequencing, postmortem tissue, archival tissue, tissue dissociation, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, ATAC-seq, 10x Genomics Chromium
- MeSH terms
- Cell Nucleus, Humans, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review