Cited by 28Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Subcellular patch-clamp techniques for single-bouton stimulation and simultaneous pre- and postsynaptic recording at cortical synapses

Vandael, David, Okamoto, Yuji, Borges-Merjane, Carolina, Vargas-Barroso, Victor, Suter, Benjamin A., Jonas, Peter·2021·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Rigorous investigation of synaptic transmission requires analysis of unitary synaptic events by simultaneous recording from presynaptic terminals and postsynaptic target neurons. However, this has been achieved at only a limited number of model synapses, including the squid giant synapse and the mammalian calyx of Held. Cortical presynaptic terminals have been largely inaccessible to direct presynaptic recording, due to their small size. Here, we describe a protocol for improved subcellular patch-clamp recording in rat and mouse brain slices, with the synapse in a largely intact environment. Slice preparation takes ~2 h, recording ~3 h and post hoc morphological analysis 2 d. Single presynaptic hippocampal mossy fiber terminals are stimulated minimally invasively in the bouton-attached configuration, in which the cytoplasmic content remains unperturbed, or in the whole-bouton configuration, in which the cytoplasmic composition can be precisely controlled. Paired pre-postsynaptic recordings can be integrated with biocytin labeling and morphological analysis, allowing correlative investigation of synapse structure and function. Paired recordings can be obtained from mossy fiber terminals in slices from both rats and mice, implying applicability to genetically modified synapses. Paired recordings can also be performed together with axon tract stimulation or optogenetic activation, allowing comparison of unitary and compound synaptic events in the same target cell. Finally, paire…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41596-021-00526-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 28

Authors
Vandael, D., Okamoto, Y., Borges-Merjane, C., Vargas-Barroso, V., Suter, B. A., & Jonas, P.
Affiliations
Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT)
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2021-05-14
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
2947-2967
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W3160265179
Cited by
28
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
cortical synapses, mossy fiber terminals, hippocampus, synaptic transmission, biocytin labeling, optogenetic stimulation, spontaneous synaptic activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Presynaptic Terminals, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review