The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-signature of human endometrial receptivity: a meta-analysis and validation study of transcriptomic biomarkers
Open accessAbstract
Previous transcriptome studies of the human endometrium have revealed hundreds of simultaneously up- and down-regulated genes that are involved in endometrial receptivity. However, the overlap between the studies is relatively small, and we are still searching for potential diagnostic biomarkers. Here we perform a meta-analysis of endometrial-receptivity associated genes on 164 endometrial samples (76 from ‘pre-receptive’ and 88 from mid-secretory, ‘receptive’ phase endometria) using a robust rank aggregation (RRA) method, followed by enrichment analysis, and regulatory microRNA prediction. We identify a meta-signature of endometrial receptivity involving 57 mRNA genes as putative receptivity markers, where 39 of these we confirm experimentally using RNA-sequencing method in two separate datasets. The meta-signature genes highlight the importance of immune responses, the complement cascade pathway and the involvement of exosomes in mid-secretory endometrial functions. Bioinformatic prediction identifies 348 microRNAs that could regulate 30 endometrial-receptivity associated genes, and we confirm experimentally the decreased expression of 19 microRNAs with 11 corresponding up-regulated meta-signature genes in our validation experiments. The 57 identified meta-signature genes and involved pathways, together with their regulatory microRNAs could serve as promising and sought-after biomarkers of endometrial receptivity, fertility and infertility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lewis, B. P., Burge, C. B., & Bartel, D. P. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035 · Cited by 11,855
Janeway, C. A., & Medzhitov, R. (2002) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.083001.084359 · Cited by 8,394
Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends
Raposo, G., & Stoorvogel, W. (2013) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201211138 · Cited by 8,099
Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs
Agarwal, V., Bell, G. W., Nam, J.-W., & Bartel, D. P. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.05005 · Cited by 7,318
miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data
Kozomara, A., & Griffiths-Jones, S. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1181 · Cited by 5,073
Origins and Mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs
Carthew, R. W., & Sontheimer, E. J. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035 · Cited by 5,018
Li, J.-H., Liu, S., Zhou, H., Qu, L.-H., & Yang, J.-H. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1248 · Cited by 4,686
Noyes, R. W., Hertig, A. T., & Rock, J. (1950) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)30062-0 · Cited by 2,843
Comprehensive modeling of microRNA targets predicts functional non-conserved and non-canonical sites
Betel, D., Koppal, A., Agius, P., Sander, C., & Leslie, C. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r90 · Cited by 1,592
g:Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments
Reimand, J., Kull, M., Peterson, H., Hansen, J., & Vilo, J. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm226 · Cited by 1,545
Cited by
(2020) · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0763-1 · Cited by 309
Obesity and female infertility
Ennab, F., & Atiomo, W. (2023) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102336 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Altmäe, S., Koel, M., Võsa, U., Adler, P., Suhorutšenko, M., Laisk-Podar, T., Kukushkina, V., Saare, M., Velthut-Meikas, A., Krjutškov, K., Aghajanova, L., Lalitkumar, P. G., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., Giudice, L., Simón, C., & Salumets, A.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2017-08-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10077-10077
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2747531951
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-signature of human endometrial receptivity: a meta-analysis and validation study of transcriptomic biomarkers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-017-10098-3
- The paper
- Altmäe, S., Koel, M., Võsa, U., Adler, P., Suhorutšenko, M., Laisk-Podar, T., Kukushkina, V., Saare, M., Velthut-Meikas, A., Krjutškov, K., Aghajanova, L., Lalitkumar, P. G., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., Giudice, L., Simón, C., & Salumets, A. (2017). Meta-signature of human endometrial receptivity: a meta-analysis and validation study of transcriptomic biomarkers. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10098-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.