The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic Monitoring of The Near Surface: A Traffic-Noise Interferometry Case Study
Open accessAbstract
Ambient-noise-based seismic monitoring of the near surface often has limited spatiotemporal resolutions because dense seismic arrays are rarely sufficiently affordable for such applications. In recent years, however, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) techniques have emerged to transform telecommunication fiber-optic cables into dense seismic arrays that are cost effective. With DAS enabling both high sensor counts (“large N”) and long-term operations (“large T”), time-lapse imaging of shear-wave velocity (V S ) structures is now possible by combining ambient noise interferometry and multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW). Here we report the first end-to-end study of time-lapse V S imaging that uses traffic noise continuously recorded on linear DAS arrays over a three-week period. Our results illustrate that for the top 20 meters the V S models that is well constrained by the data, we obtain time-lapse repeatability of about 2% in the model domain—a threshold that is low enough for observing subtle near-surface changes such as water content variations and permafrost alteration. This study demonstrates the efficacy of near-surface seismic monitoring using DAS-recorded ambient noise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Distributed optical fiber sensing: Review and perspective
Lu, P., Lalam, N., Badar, M., Liu, B., Chorpening, B. T., Buric, M. P., & Ohodnicki, P. R. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5113955 · Cited by 851
Fiber‐Optic Network Observations of Earthquake Wavefields
Lindsey, N. J., Martin, E. R., Dreger, D. S., Freifeld, B., Cole, S., James, S. R., Biondi, B. L., & Ajo‐Franklin, J. B. (2017) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl075722 · Cited by 486
Self-citationOptical fiber sensing for marine environment and marine structural health monitoring: A review
Min, R., Liu, Z., Pereira, L., Yang, C., Sui, Q., & Marques, C. (2021) · Optics & Laser Technology · doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107082 · Cited by 475
City-Scale Dark Fiber DAS Measurements of Infrastructure Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Lindsey, N. J., Yuan, S., Lellouch, A., Gualtieri, L., Lecocq, T., & Biondi, B. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl089931 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dou, S., Lindsey, N., Wagner, A. M., Daley, T. M., Freifeld, B., Robertson, M., Peterson, J., Ulrich, C., Martin, E. R., & Ajo-Franklin, J. B.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2017-09-14
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11620-11620
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2754661765
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic Monitoring of The Near Surface: A Traffic-Noise Interferometry Case Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-017-11986-4
- The paper
- Dou, S., Lindsey, N., Wagner, A. M., Daley, T. M., Freifeld, B., Robertson, M., Peterson, J., Ulrich, C., Martin, E. R., & Ajo-Franklin, J. B. (2017). Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic Monitoring of The Near Surface: A Traffic-Noise Interferometry Case Study. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11986-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.