Predicting non-melanoma skin cancer via a multi-parameterized artificial neural network
Open accessAbstract
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure and family history are major associated risk factors for the development of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a multi-parameterized artificial neural network based on available personal health information for early detection of NMSC with high sensitivity and specificity, even in the absence of known UVR exposure and family history. The 1997–2015 NHIS adult survey data used to train and validate our neural network (NN) comprised of 2,056 NMSC and 460,574 non-cancer cases. We extracted 13 parameters for our NN: gender, age, BMI, diabetic status, smoking status, emphysema, asthma, race, Hispanic ethnicity, hypertension, heart diseases, vigorous exercise habits, and history of stroke. This study yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.81 and 0.81 for training and validation, respectively. Our results (training sensitivity 88.5% and specificity 62.2%, validation sensitivity 86.2% and specificity 62.7%) were comparable to a previous study of basal and squamous cell carcinoma prediction that also included UVR exposure and family history information. These results indicate that our NN is robust enough to make predictions, suggesting that we have identified novel associations and potential predictive parameters of NMSC.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Roffman, D., Hart, G., Girardi, M., Ko, C. J., & Deng, J.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deng, Jun
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2018-01-26
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1701-1701
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5786038
- OpenAlex
- W2807032201
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB022589)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- non-melanoma skin cancer, artificial neural networks, early detection, risk factors, UV exposure, family history (medicine), NHIS, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, comorbidities, lifestyle factors, prediction model
- MeSH terms
- Decision Support Techniques, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Skin Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer, Early Diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review