Cited by 104Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareAI in cancer detection

Predicting non-melanoma skin cancer via a multi-parameterized artificial neural network

Open access
Roffman, David, Hart, Gregory, Girardi, Michael, Ko, Christine J., Deng, Jun·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure and family history are major associated risk factors for the development of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a multi-parameterized artificial neural network based on available personal health information for early detection of NMSC with high sensitivity and specificity, even in the absence of known UVR exposure and family history. The 1997–2015 NHIS adult survey data used to train and validate our neural network (NN) comprised of 2,056 NMSC and 460,574 non-cancer cases. We extracted 13 parameters for our NN: gender, age, BMI, diabetic status, smoking status, emphysema, asthma, race, Hispanic ethnicity, hypertension, heart diseases, vigorous exercise habits, and history of stroke. This study yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.81 and 0.81 for training and validation, respectively. Our results (training sensitivity 88.5% and specificity 62.2%, validation sensitivity 86.2% and specificity 62.7%) were comparable to a previous study of basal and squamous cell carcinoma prediction that also included UVR exposure and family history information. These results indicate that our NN is robust enough to make predictions, suggesting that we have identified novel associations and potential predictive parameters of NMSC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-19907-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 104

Authors
Roffman, D., Hart, G., Girardi, M., Ko, C. J., & Deng, J.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Deng, Jun
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-01-26
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1701-1701
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807032201
Cited by
104
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB022589)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
non-melanoma skin cancer, artificial neural networks, early detection, risk factors, UV exposure, family history (medicine), NHIS, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, comorbidities, lifestyle factors, prediction model
MeSH terms
Decision Support Techniques, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Skin Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review