Cited by 160Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Rational Cell Culture Optimization Enhances Experimental Reproducibility in Cancer Cells

Open access
Wright Muelas, Marina, Ortega, Fernando, Breitling, Rainer, Bendtsen, Claus, Westerhoff, Hans V.·2018·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Optimization of experimental conditions is critical in ensuring robust experimental reproducibility. Through detailed metabolomic analysis we found that cell culture conditions significantly impacted on glutaminase (GLS1) sensitivity resulting in variable sensitivity and irreproducibility in data. Baseline metabolite profiling highlighted that untreated cells underwent significant changes in metabolic status. Both the extracellular levels of glutamine and lactate and the intracellular levels of multiple metabolites changed drastically during the assay. We show that these changes compromise the robustness of the assay and make it difficult to reproduce. We discuss the implications of the cells' metabolic environment when studying the effects of perturbations to cell function by any type of inhibitor. We then devised 'metabolically rationalized standard' assay conditions, in which glutaminase-1 inhibition reduced glutamine metabolism differently in both cell lines assayed, and decreased the proliferation of one of them. The adoption of optimized conditions such as the ones described here should lead to an improvement in reproducibility and help eliminate false negatives as well as false positives in these assays.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-21050-4

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing recommendations that aim to increase the relevance of in vitro cultures to in vivo physiology are available for many of these factors.

    “For many of these factors, existing recommendations that aim to increase the relevance of in vitro cultures to in vivo physiology are available (Baker, 2016; Muelas et al., 2018; Hirsch and Schildknecht, 2019).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Muelas et al., 2018

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes existing reporting standards and recommends documenting culture factors including cell density, medium, nutrients, and pH. It presents these measures as ways to improve reproducibility and assay evaluation, not specifically as recommendations to make in vitro cultures more representative of in vivo physiology. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Medium changes have been shown to influence oxygen supply and cellular metabolism, as well as synthesis of proteins, DNA, and RNA.

    “Medium changes have been shown to influence oxygen supply and cellular metabolism, as well as synthesis of proteins, DNA, and RNA (Al-Ani et al., 2018; Wright Muelas et al., 2018).”

    From In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards (2019) · cites this paper as Wright Muelas et al., 2018

    The Results section (‘Explanation: The cellular environment is uncontrolled’; page not provided) describes changing culture-medium conditions, including glutamine depletion, that could alter cellular metabolism. The cited paper does not establish that medium changes affect oxygen supply or the synthesis of proteins, DNA, and RNA; searches for those effects found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [2]Errington TM An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research eLife Sciences 2014 3 e04333 PMC4270077 25490932
  2. [4]Shoemaker RH The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen Nat Rev Cancer 2006 6 813 823 10.1038/nrc1951 16990858 · DOI
  3. [5]León Z García-Cañaveras JC Donato MT Lahoz A Mammalian cell metabolomics: Experimental design and sample preparation Electrophoresis 2013 34 2762 2775 23436493
  4. [6]Tritsch GL Moore GE Spontaneous decomposition of glutamine in cell culture media Experimental Cell Research 1962 28 360 364 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90290-2 13994204 · DOI
  5. [7]Heeneman S Deutz NEP Buurman WA The concentrations of glutamine and ammonia in commercially available cell culture media Journal of Immunological Methods 1993 166 85 91 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90331-Z 8228290 · DOI
  6. [8]Freshney, R. I. In Culture of Cells for Tissue Engineering 1–22, 10.1002/0471741817.ch1 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006). · DOI
  7. [12]Hatzis, C. et al. Enhancing reproducibility in cancer drug screening: how do we move forward? Cancer Research74, 4016–4023. PMC4119520 25015668
  8. [13]Haverty PM Reproducible pharmacogenomic profiling of cancer cell line panels Nature 2016 533 333 337 10.1038/nature17987 27193678 · DOI
  9. [16]Le A Glucose-Independent Glutamine Metabolism via TCA Cycling for Proliferation and Survival in B Cells Cell Metab. 2012 15 110 121 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.12.009 22225880 PMC3345194 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [19]DeBerardinis RJ Beyond aerobic glycolysis: Transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007 104 19345 19350 10.1073/pnas.0709747104 PMC2148292 18032601 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [20]Hassanein M SLC1A5 Mediates Glutamine Transport Required for Lung Cancer Cell Growth and Survival Clinical Cancer Research 2013 19 560 570 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2334 23213057 PMC3697078 · DOI
  12. [22]Schulze A Harris AL How cancer metabolism is tuned for proliferation and vulnerable to disruption Nat Rev Cancer 2012 491 364 373 23151579
  13. [23]Zhao Y Butler EB Tan M Targeting cellular metabolism to improve cancer therapeutics Cell Death Dis 2013 4 e532 10.1038/cddis.2013.60 23470539 PMC3613838 · DOI
  14. [24]Vander Heiden MG Targeting cancer metabolism: a therapeutic window opens Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2011 10 671 684 10.1038/nrd3504 21878982 · DOI
  15. [27]Brower M Carney DN Oie HK Gazdar AF Minna JD Growth of Cell Lines and Clinical Specimens of Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Serum-free Defined Medium Cancer Research 1986 46 798 806 3940644
  16. [28]Tinnemans MM S-phase arrest of nutrient deprived lung cancer cells Cytometry 1995 19 326 333 10.1002/cyto.990190407 7796697 · DOI
  17. [29]Ishii T Nutritional deficiency affects cell cycle status and viability in A549 cells: role of p27Kip1 Cancer Lett. 2004 213 99 109 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.03.022 15312689 · DOI
  18. [30]Qie S Glutamine depletion and glucose depletion trigger growth inhibition via distinctive gene expression reprogramming Cell Cycle 2014 11 3679 3690 10.4161/cc.21944 PMC3478318 22935705 · DOI
  19. [31]Schneider M The importance of ammonia in mammalian cell culture Journal of Biotechnology 1996 46 161 185 10.1016/0168-1656(95)00196-4 8672289 · DOI
  20. [32]Huang W A proposed role for glutamine in cancer cell growth through acid resistance Cell Research 2013 23 724 727 10.1038/cr.2013.15 23357849 PMC3641590 · DOI
  21. [33]LaMonte G Acidosis induces reprogramming of cellular metabolism to mitigate oxidative stress Cancer Metab 2013 1 23 10.1186/2049-3002-1-23 24359630 PMC4178214 · DOI
  22. [34]Zinninger GF Little JB Proliferation kinetics of density-inhibited cultures of human cells, a complex invitro cell system Cancer Research 1973 33 2343 2348 4741932
  23. [35]Haanstra JR Targeting pathogen metabolism without collateral damage to the host Sci. Rep. 2017 7 40406 10.1038/srep40406 28084422 PMC5234033 · DOI
  24. [36]Haanstra JR A domino effect in drug action: from metabolic assault towards parasite differentiation Mol. Microbiol. 2011 79 94 108 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07435.x 21166896 · DOI
  25. [37]Raamsdonk LM A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations Nat Biotechnol 2001 19 45 50 10.1038/83496 11135551 · DOI
  26. [38]Brazma A Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)- toward standards for microarray data Nat. Genet. 2001 29 365 371 10.1038/ng1201-365 11726920 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [40]Taylor CF The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE) Nat Biotechnol 2007 25 887 893 10.1038/nbt1329 17687369 · DOI
  28. [43]Le Novère N Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM) Nat Biotechnol 2005 23 1509 1515 10.1038/nbt1156 16333295 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [44]Michopoulos F Targeted profiling of polar intracellular metabolites using ion-pair-high performance liquid chromatography and -ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry: Applications to serum, urine and tissue extracts Journal of Chromatography A 2014 1349 60 68 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.05.019 24861786 · DOI
  30. [45]Veselkov KA Optimized Preprocessing of Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Urinary Metabolic Profiles for Improved Information Recovery Anal. Chem. 2011 83 5864 5872 10.1021/ac201065j 21526840 · DOI
  31. [46]Puck TT Marcus PI Cieciura SJ Clonal growth of mammalian cells in vitro; growth characteristics of colonies from single HeLa cells with and without a feeder layer J Exp Med 1956 103 273 284 10.1084/jem.103.2.273 13286432 PMC2136583 · DOI
  32. [47]Del Monte U Does the cell number 109 still really fit one gram of tumor tissue? Cell Cycle 2009 8 505 506 10.4161/cc.8.3.7608 19176997 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright Muelas, M., Ortega, F., Breitling, R., Bendtsen, C., & Westerhoff, H. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-02-14
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
3029-3029
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949384615
Cited by
160
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M017702/1, 1088313)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
cell culture optimization, experimental reproducibility, cancer cells, GLS1, glutamine metabolism, lactate, intracellular metabolites, metabolite profiling, assay standardization, cell proliferation, false positives and false negatives
MeSH terms
Animals, Glutaminase, Glutamine, Humans, Neoplasms, Research Design, Thiadiazoles, Reproducibility of Results, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review