Cited by 44Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

Combined use of CEMIP and CA 19-9 enhances diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cancer

Open access
Lee, Hee Seung, Jang, Chan Young, Kim, Sun A, Park, Soo Been, Jung, Dawoon E., Kim, Bo Ok, Kim, Ha Yan, Chung, Moon Jae +4 more·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 is the only diagnostic marker used in pancreatic cancer despite its limitations. Here, we aimed to identify the diagnostic role of CEMIP (also called KIAA1199) combined with CA 19-9 in patients with pancreatic cancer. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient samples was performed to determine the benefit of diagnostic markers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. We investigated CEMIP and CA 19-9 levels in 324 patients with pancreatic cancer and 49 normal controls using serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Median CA 19-9 and CEMIP levels were 410.5 U/ml (40.8–3342.5) and 0.67 ng/ml (0.40–1.08), respectively, in patients with pancreatic cancer. The AUROC for CA 19-9 and CEMIP were 0.847 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.806–0.888) and 0.760 (95% CI: 0.689–0.831), respectively. Combination of CA 19-9 with CEMIP showed markedly improved AUROC over CA 19-9 alone in pancreatic cancer diagnosis (0.94 vs. 0.89; P < 0.0001). CEMIP showed a diagnostic yield of 86.1% (68/79) in CA 19-9 negative pancreatic cancer. Combined use with CEMIP showed significantly improved diagnostic value compared with CA 19-9 alone in pancreatic cancer. Especially, CEMIP may be a complementary marker in pancreatic cancer patients with normal CA 19-9 levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-21823-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A combination of CA19-9 and CEMIP gave a higher area under the ROC curve than CA19-9 alone, 0.94 versus 0.89.

    “Lee and colleagues78 reported an improved area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) using a combination of CA19–9 and cell migration-inducing hyaluronan binding protein (CEMIP; a protein involved in the degradation of hyaluronan) compared with using CA19–9 alone (AUC=0·94 vs 0·89).”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [78]

  • CEMIP correctly identified 68 of 79 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients whose CA19-9 was below 37 U/mL.

    “Importantly, CEMIP correctly diagnosed 68 of 79 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma whose CA19–9 concentrations were in the normal range (below 37 U/mL).”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [78]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H. S., Jang, C. Y., Kim, S. A., Park, S. B., Jung, D. E., Kim, B. O., Kim, H. Y., Chung, M. J., Park, J. Y., Bang, S., Park, S. W., & Song, S. Y.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Song, Si Young
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-02-21
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
3383-3383
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796588262
Cited by
44
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • Yonsei University (HI14C1324)
  • Korea Health Industry Development Institute (HI14C1324)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (HI14C1324)
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, CEMIP, KIAA1199, CA19-9, serum tumor markers, diagnostic accuracy, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Female, Humans, Hyaluronoglucosaminidase, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, CA-19-9 Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review