The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying influential spreaders by gravity model
Open accessAbstract
Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks is crucial in understanding, controlling and accelerating spreading processes for diseases, information, innovations, behaviors, and so on. Inspired by the gravity law, we propose a gravity model that utilizes both neighborhood information and path information to measure a node’s importance in spreading dynamics. In order to reduce the accumulated errors caused by interactions at distance and to lower the computational complexity, a local version of the gravity model is further proposed by introducing a truncation radius. Empirical analyses of the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) spreading dynamics on fourteen real networks show that the gravity model and the local gravity model perform very competitively in comparison with well-known state-of-the-art methods. For the local gravity model, the empirical results suggest an approximately linear relation between the optimal truncation radius and the average distance of the network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness
Freeman, L. C. (1977) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/3033543 · Cited by 10,295
A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION
KENDALL, M. G. (1938) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81 · Cited by 7,269
The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases
Hethcote, H. W. (2000) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144500371907 · Cited by 6,687
The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa066082 · Cited by 5,007
Assortative Mixing in Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.208701 · Cited by 4,988
Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.036104 · Cited by 4,761
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Ren, T., Ma, X., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, T.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2019-06-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8387-8387
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2948445876
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying influential spreaders by gravity model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-019-44930-9
- The paper
- Li, Z., Ren, T., Ma, X., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, T. (2019). Identifying influential spreaders by gravity model. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44930-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.