Cited by 66Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentBRCA gene mutations in cancerIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies

Prospective Validation of an Ex Vivo, Patient-Derived 3D Spheroid Model for Response Predictions in Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer

Open access
Shuford, Stephen, Wilhelm, Christine, Rayner, Melissa, Elrod, Ashley, Millard, Melissa, Mattingly, Christina, Lotstein, Alina, Smith, Ashley M. +17 more·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Although 70-80% of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients respond to first-line therapy, almost all relapse and five-year survival remains below 50%. One strategy to increase five-year survival is prolonging time to relapse by improving first-line therapy response. However, no biomarker today can accurately predict individual response to therapy. In this study, we present analytical and prospective clinical validation of a new test that utilizes primary patient tissue in 3D cell culture to make patient-specific response predictions prior to initiation of treatment in the clinic. Test results were generated within seven days of tissue receipt from newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients obtained at standard surgical debulking or laparoscopic biopsy. Patients were followed for clinical response to chemotherapy. In a study population of 44, the 32 test-predicted Responders had a clinical response rate of 100% across both adjuvant and neoadjuvant treated populations with an overall prediction accuracy of 89% (39 of 44, p < 0.0001). The test also functioned as a prognostic readout with test-predicted Responders having a significantly increased progression-free survival compared to test-predicted Non-Responders, p = 0.01. This correlative accuracy establishes the test's potential to benefit ovarian cancer patients through accurate prediction of patient-specific response before treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-47578-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient-derived spheroids grown in 384-well ULA plates derived from primary debulking surgery formed over 24 h and after a further 72 h of growth predicted patient response to first-line adjuvant chemotherapies with 89% accuracy.

    “Patient-derived spheroids grown in 384-well ULA plates derived from primary debulking surgery formed over 24 h and after a further 72 h of growth predicted patient response to first-line adjuvant chemotherapies with 89% accuracy (Shuford et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 66

Authors
Shuford, S., Wilhelm, C., Rayner, M., Elrod, A., Millard, M., Mattingly, C., Lotstein, A., Smith, A. M., Guo, Q. J., O’Donnell, L., Elder, J., Puls, L., Weroha, S. J., Hou, X., Zanfagnin, V., Nick, A., Stany, M. P., Maxwell, G. L., Conrads, T., Sood, A. K., Orr, D., Holmes, L. M., Gevaert, M., Crosswell, H. E., & DesRochers, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Kiyatec (United States) (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Prisma Health (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Saint Thomas Health (US)
  • Inova Fairfax Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
DesRochers, Teresa M.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
11153-11153
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965335596
Cited by
66
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA136393)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA136393)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Keywords
ovarian cancer, 3D spheroid model, patient-derived tumor tissue, predictive biomarkers, chemotherapy response prediction, first-line therapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, progression-free survival, prognostic factors, ex vivo cell culture
MeSH terms
Progression-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Treatment Outcome, Spheroids, Cellular, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review