CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureScheduling and Timetabling SolutionsConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of Quantum Annealing to Nurse Scheduling Problem

Open access
Ikeda, Kazuki, Nakamura, Yuma, Humble, Travis S.·2019·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-49172-3PMC PMC6731278
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Quantum annealing is a promising heuristic method to solve combinatorial optimization problems, and efforts to quantify performance on real-world problems provide insights into how this approach may be best used in practice. We investigate the empirical performance of quantum annealing to solve the Nurse Scheduling Problem (NSP) with hard constraints using the D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealing device. NSP seeks the optimal assignment for a set of nurses to shifts under an accompanying set of constraints on schedule and personnel. After reducing NSP to a novel Ising-type Hamiltonian, we evaluate the solution quality obtained from the D-Wave 2000Q against the constraint requirements as well as the diversity of solutions. For the test problems explored here, our results indicate that quantum annealing recovers satisfying solutions for NSP and suggests the heuristic method is potentially achievable for practical use. Moreover, we observe that solution quality can be greatly improved through the use of reverse annealing, in which it is possible to refine returned results by using the annealing process a second time. We compare the performance of NSP using both forward and reverse annealing methods and describe how this approach might be used in practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-49172-3

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Graphical examples of the computed shift schedules for the case of N=3 nurses for D=4 days. A black square indicates that a nurse is scheduled to work. The horizontal axes labels the days and the vertical axes labels the nurses. The left figure represents a schedule that satisfies all the constraints, while the right figure represents a schedule that fails to satisfy the soft nurse constraint of every nurse being assigned some days of work.
Figure 1 Graphical examples of the computed shift schedules for the case of N=3 nurses for D=4 days. A black square indicates that a nurse is scheduled to work. The horizontal axes labels the days and the vertical axes labels the nurses. The left figure represents a schedule that satisfies all the constraints, while the right figure represents a schedule that fails to satisfy the soft nurse constraint of every nurse being assigned some days of work.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 The probability of finding a ground state of the Hamiltonian by using D-Wave 2000Q (left) and simulate annealing (right) for (blue) N=3 and (red) N=4 with respect to the number of days D in the schedule. Each error bar is generated by the standard deviation (1000 samples for 10 shots for D-Wave 2000Q and 500 annealing times 10 shots for SA).
Figure 2 The probability of finding a ground state of the Hamiltonian by using D-Wave 2000Q (left) and simulate annealing (right) for (blue) N=3 and (red) N=4 with respect to the number of days D in the schedule. Each error bar is generated by the standard deviation (1000 samples for 10 shots for D-Wave 2000Q and 500 annealing times 10 shots for SA).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 The Hamming distance between consecutive forward annealing solutions with respect to number of schedule days for (blue) N=3 nurses and (red) N=4 nurses. Error bars are based on the standard deviation.
Figure 3 The Hamming distance between consecutive forward annealing solutions with respect to number of schedule days for (blue) N=3 nurses and (red) N=4 nurses. Error bars are based on the standard deviation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 A reverse annealing schedule used in our study plotted with respect to the evolution of the dimensionless parameter s.
Figure 4 A reverse annealing schedule used in our study plotted with respect to the evolution of the dimensionless parameter s.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Probability of finding the ground states of the NSP Hamiltonian by reverse annealing. Each error bar is generated by the standard deviation (1000 samples times 10 shots for each problem).
Figure 5 Probability of finding the ground states of the NSP Hamiltonian by reverse annealing. Each error bar is generated by the standard deviation (1000 samples times 10 shots for each problem).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Hamming distance between consecutive reverse annealing solutions (1000 samples for each problem). Error bars are based on the standard deviation.
Figure 6 Hamming distance between consecutive reverse annealing solutions (1000 samples for each problem). Error bars are based on the standard deviation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Probability of finding the ground states of the NSP Hamiltonian by reverse annealing. Error bars are based on the standard deviation (1000 samples times 10 shots for each problem).
Figure 7 Probability of finding the ground states of the NSP Hamiltonian by reverse annealing. Error bars are based on the standard deviation (1000 samples times 10 shots for each problem).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 The Hamming distance of consecutive reverse annealing solutions (1000 samples for each problem). Error bars are based on the standard deviation.
Figure 8 The Hamming distance of consecutive reverse annealing solutions (1000 samples for each problem). Error bars are based on the standard deviation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 Solutions of the proposed three-shift NSP with additional constraints. DT, EN and LN refer to daytime, early night and late night work shift. Among (a–c), the day-off requests are tuned differently as g(n,d)=0 for (a), g(1,4)=1, g(2,6)=1.5 and g(3,5)=2 in (b) and g(1,6)=1, g(2,6)=1.5 and g(3,4)=2 in (c).
Figure 9 Solutions of the proposed three-shift NSP with additional constraints. DT, EN and LN refer to daytime, early night and late night work shift. Among (a–c), the day-off requests are tuned differently as g(n,d)=0 for (a), g(1,4)=1, g(2,6)=1.5 and g(3,5)=2 in (b) and g(1,6)=1, g(2,6)=1.5 and g(3,4)=2 in (c).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stollenwerk, T. et al. Quantum Annealing Applied to De-Conflicting Optimal Trajectories for Air Traffic Management, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1711.04889, arXiv:1711.04889 [quant-ph] (2017). · arXiv
  2. Neukart, F. et al. Traffic Flow Optimization Using a Quantum Annealer, Frontiers in ICT 4, 29 (2017). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–138 of 138

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ikeda, K., Nakamura, Y., & Humble, T. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Ikeda, Kazuki
ORCID
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-09-06
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
12837-12837
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41598-019-49172-3
PMC
PMC6731278
OpenAlex
W2972088227
Cited by
139
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC05?, 00OR22725)
  • Battelle (DE-AC05- 00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC05)
  • UT-Battelle (DE-AC05, DEAC05-00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Office of Science (DEAC05- 00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19J11073)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (AC05-00OR22725)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Keywords
quantum annealing, nurse scheduling, D-Wave 2000Q, Ising Hamiltonian, reverse annealing, combinatorial optimization, hard constraints, solution quality, solution diversity, shift assignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review