Cited by 100Algal biology and biofuel productionWastewater Treatment and ReuseAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Utilization of tannery wastewater for biofuel production: New insights on microalgae growth and biomass production

Open access
Nagi, Mostafa, He, Meilin, Li, Dan, Gebreluel, Temesgen, Cheng, Bian, Wang, Changhai·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Microalgae cultivation on tannery wastewater (TWW) has been examined in some studies as a possible biological application to reduce contamination load and discharge effluents safely. However, Growth aspects, different tolerate strains and enriching the medium were not well investigated. In our study we applied Scenedesmus sp., Chlorella variabilis and Chlorella sorokiniana with different TWW concentrations. C. sorokiniana and C. variabilis cell density, chlorophyll, and sugar content grew substantially as compared to control. C.sorokiniana biomass and total lipids folded three and two times in 25% and 40% TWW, respectively as compared to control. Scenedesmus sp. showed longer lag phase and lower performance compared to the other two strains. Kelp waste extract (KWE) was added to balance the nutrients supply for C. sorokiniana, of which growth and effluents indicators were then greatly promoted in all concentrations. As the lag phase was shortened from 8 to 4 days in 60% concentration, subsequently, chlorophyll, carbohydrates, biomass and total lipids appreciated by 184%, 400%, 162% and 135%, respectively. Furthermore, the COD and ammonium removals improved by 51% and 45%, respectively. These outcomes emphasize the suitability of using TWW for microalgae cultivation with the suitable concentration while adding kelp waste extract for further enhancement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-57120-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 100

Authors
Nagi, M., He, M., Li, D., Gebreluel, T., Cheng, B., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Changhai
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-01-30
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1530-1530
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003265117
Cited by
100
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770436)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
tannery wastewater, microalgae cultivation, biofuel production, Chlorella sorokiniana, Chlorella variabilis, Scenedesmus, microalgal biomass, lipid production, COD removal, ammonium removal, wastewater treatment, lag phase
MeSH terms
Chlorella, Lipids, Biomass, Scenedesmus, Biofuels, Microalgae, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review