Emotions and brain function are altered up to one month after a single high dose of psilocybin.
Open accessAbstract
Psilocybin is a classic psychedelic compound that may have efficacy for the treatment of mood and substance use disorders. Acute psilocybin effects include reduced negative mood, increased positive mood, and reduced amygdala response to negative affective stimuli. However, no study has investigated the long-term, enduring impact of psilocybin on negative affect and associated brain function. Twelve healthy volunteers (7F/5M) completed an open-label pilot study including assessments 1-day before, 1-week after, and 1-month after receiving a 25 mg/70 kg dose of psilocybin to test the hypothesis that psilocybin administration leads to enduring changes in affect and neural correlates of affect. One-week post-psilocybin, negative affect and amygdala response to facial affect stimuli were reduced, whereas positive affect and dorsal lateral prefrontal and medial orbitofrontal cortex responses to emotionally-conflicting stimuli were increased. One-month post-psilocybin, negative affective and amygdala response to facial affect stimuli returned to baseline levels while positive affect remained elevated, and trait anxiety was reduced. Finally, the number of significant resting-state functional connections across the brain increased from baseline to 1-week and 1-month post-psilocybin. These preliminary findings suggest that psilocybin may increase emotional and brain plasticity, and the reported findings support the hypothesis that negative affect may be a therapeutic target for psilocybin.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The beneficial effects of psychoplastogens can last for months following a single administration.
“While the beneficial effects of psychoplastogens can last for months following a single administration (40, 166, 167)”
From Psychedelics and Other Psychoplastogens for Treating Mental Illness. (2021) · cites this paper as [167]
The Introduction reports clinical-symptom reductions lasting months after 1 to 3 psilocybin administrations. This study followed a single administration for only one month (Abstract), so it does not establish benefits lasting months after one dose or across psychoplastogens generally. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe strength of mystical experience correlates with diminished anxiety and depression in terminal cancer patients.
“and with diminished anxiety and depression in terminal cancer patients (Griffiths et al., 2016;Ross et al., 2016;Barrett et al., 2020).”
From Psychedelics and Neural Plasticity: Therapeutic Implications (2022) · cites this paper as Barrett et al., 2020
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that psilocybin may reduce depression and anxiety, and the References identify trials in patients with life-threatening cancer. But this paper studied healthy volunteers (Methods > Participants, page unavailable) and does not report a correlation between the strength of mystical experience and symptom reductions in cancer patients. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIngestion of a psychedelic drug can induce rapid and persisting changes in personality traits, particularly reductions in neuroticism, in both healthy and clinical populations.
“It has been repeatedly found that ingestion of a psychedelic drug can induce rapid and persisting changes in personality traits, and particularly reductions in neuroticism, in both healthy and clinical populations (24, 35–41).”
From Decreases in State and Trait Anxiety Post-psilocybin: A Naturalistic, Observational Study Among Retreat Attendees (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
The Results section reports significant changes in conscientiousness and absorption one month after psilocybin, supporting a persisting change in some personality traits. The Discussion describes the decrease in neuroticism as numerical, not significant, and says whether the findings apply to patient populations remains undetermined. The paper therefore does not establish the claimed reduction in neuroticism in both healthy and clinical populations. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOne study reported reductions in personality-related (trait) anxiety 1 month after psilocybin ingestion.
“reductions in personality-related (trait) anxiety 1 month after psilocybin ingestion (24)”
From Decreases in State and Trait Anxiety Post-psilocybin: A Naturalistic, Observational Study Among Retreat Attendees (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
One study reported persisting reductions in acute (state) anxiety 1 week after psilocybin ingestion.
“one study reporting persisting reductions in acute (state) anxiety 1 week”
From Decreases in State and Trait Anxiety Post-psilocybin: A Naturalistic, Observational Study Among Retreat Attendees (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 108 · Cited by 375
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [51]John, O. P., Naumann, L. P. & Soto, C. J. Paradigm Shift in the Integrative Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issues. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research 114–158 (Guilford Press, 2008).
- Authors
- Barrett, F. S., Doss, M. K., Sepeda, N. D., Pekar, J. J., & Griffiths, R. R.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barrett, Frederick S.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2020-02-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2214-2214
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7010702
- OpenAlex
- W3005441929
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 21
- FWCI
- 19.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Heffter Research Institute
- Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA003889, R03DA042336, RO1DA03889)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB015909)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- psilocybin, psychedelics, negative affect, positive affect, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, emotional conflict, trait anxiety, resting-state functional connectivity, neuroplasticity, long-term effects, mood disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hallucinogens, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Pilot Projects, Psilocybin, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review