Cited by 28Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesLivestock and Poultry ManagementArchaeological and Geological Studies

The earliest farmers of northwest China exploited grain-fed pheasants not chickens

Open access
Barton, Loukas, Bingham, Brittany, Sankaranarayanan, Krithivasan, Monroe, Cara, Thomas, Ariane, Kemp, Brian M.·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Though chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) are globally ubiquitous today, the timing, location, and manner of their domestication is contentious. Until recently, archaeologists placed the origin of the domestic chicken in northern China, perhaps as early as 8,000 years ago. Such evidence however complicates our understanding of how the chicken was domesticated because its wild progenitor – the red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) – lives in tropical ecosystems and does not exist in northern China today or in the recent past. Increasingly, multiple lines of evidence suggest that many of the archaeological bird remains underlying this northern origins hypothesis have been misidentified. Here we analyze the mitochondrial DNA of some of the earliest purported chickens from the Dadiwan site in northern China and conclude that they are pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Curiously, stable isotope values from the same birds reveal that their diet was heavy in agricultural products (namely millet), meaning that they lived adjacent to or among some of the earliest farming communities in East Asia. We suggest that the exploitation of these baited birds was an important adaptation for early farmers in China’s arid north, and that management practices like these likely played a role in the domestication of animals – including the chicken – in similar contexts throughout the region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-59316-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This suggests that grain attracted different gallinaceous birds into village settings.

    “thus suggesting that this grain attracted different gallinaceous birds into village settings.”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [115]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says birds native to the area fed on village refuse and that agricultural waste could affect their abundance, supporting the idea that grain-related resources drew birds near villages. The study identifies the Dadiwan birds as pheasants; it raises the possibility of managing other birds but does not establish that different gallinaceous species were attracted in this way. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pheasant bone remains from Dadiwan in northern China subsisted on cultivated millet.

    “a recent genetic and isotopic study (115) of pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) bone remains (originally presumed to be chickens) from the site of Dadiwan in northern China demonstrated that the birds subsisted on cultivated millet”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [115]

    The Discussion identifies the Dadiwan birds as pheasants, and Study Specimens reports isotopic evidence that they ate C4 plants, most likely millets. But Study Specimens describes a mixed diet of C4 and C3 resources, while the Discussion says the birds ate either stored grain or waste from millet processing. The paper therefore does not establish that they subsisted specifically on cultivated millet grain. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Grain production within a human niche has been shown to also attract other birds.

    “Grain production within a human niche has been shown to also attract other birds.”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [115]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]Yan, W. Nong ye fa sheng yu wen ming qi yuan (The origin of agriculture and civilization). (Kexue Chubanshe (Science Press), 2000).
  2. [13]Zhang DJ Gansu Dadiwan yizhi jujin liuwannian lai de kaogu jilu yu hanzuo nongye qiyuan (Archaeological records of Dadiwan in the past 60 ka and the origin of millet agriculture) Zhongguo Kexue Yuan (Chinese Science Bulletin) 2010 55 887 894
  3. [14]Bettinger, R. L. et al. In Late Quaternary Climate Change and Human Adaptation in Arid China Developments in Quaternary Science (Eds David B. Madsen, Xing Gao, & Fa Hu Chen) 83–101 (Elsevier, 2007).

Authors
Barton, L., Bingham, B., Sankaranarayanan, K., Monroe, C., Thomas, A., & Kemp, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Barton, Loukas
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-02-13
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
2556-2556
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006330539
Cited by
28
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation
  • University of Oklahoma
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Livestock and Poultry Management
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
chicken domestication, Phasianus colchicus, chickens, mitochondrial DNA, stable isotope analysis, ancient agriculture, animal management, northern China, East Asia
MeSH terms
Millets, Farmers, Domestication, Animals, Archaeology, Chickens, China, DNA, Mitochondrial, Humans, Phylogeny, Quail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review