The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global prevalence and distribution of vancomycin resistant, vancomycin intermediate and heterogeneously vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(VRSA), Vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus(VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) are subject to vancomycin treatment failure. The aim of the present study was to determine their precise prevalence and investigate prevalence variability depending on different years and locations. Several international databases including Medline (PubMed), Embase and Web of Sciences were searched (data from 1997 to 2019) to identify studies that addressed the prevalence of VRSA, VISA and hVISA among human clinical isolates around the world. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to indicate potential source of variation. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 14.0). Data analysis showed that VRSA, VISA and hVISA isolates were reported in 23, 50 and 82 studies, with an overall prevalence of 1.5% among 5855 S. aureus isolates, 1.7% among 22,277 strains and 4.6% among 47,721 strains, respectively. The overall prevalence of VRSA, VISA, and hVISA before 2010 was 1.2%, 1.2%, and 4%, respectively, while their prevalence after this year has reached 2.4%, 4.3%, and 5.3%. The results of this study showed that the frequency of VRSA, VISA and hVISA after 2010 represent a 2.0, 3.6 and 1.3-fold increase over prior years. In a subgroup analysis of different strain origins, the highest frequency of VRSA (3.6%) and hVISA (5.2%) was encountered in the USA while VISA (2.1%) was more prevalent in Asia. Meta-regression analysis showed significant increasing of VISA prevalence in recent years (p value ≤ 0.05). Based on the results of case reports (which were not included in the calculations mentioned above), the numbers of VRSA, VISA and hVISA isolates were 12, 24 and 14, respectively, among different continents. Since the prevalence of VRSA, VISA and hVISA has been increasing in recent years (especially in the Asian and American continents), rigorous monitoring of vancomycin treatment, it’s the therapeutic response and the definition of appropriate control guidelines depending on geographical regions is highly recommended and essential to prevent the further spread of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Infection with Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Containing the vanA Resistance Gene
Chang, S., Sievert, D. M., Hageman, J. C., Boulton, M. L., Tenover, F. C., Downes, F. P., Shah, S., Rudrik, J. T., Pupp, G. R., Brown, W. J., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa025025 · Cited by 1,095
Howden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Gardete, S., & Tomasz, A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci68834 · Cited by 565
Transferable Vancomycin Resistance in a Community-Associated MRSA Lineage
Rossi, F., Diaz, L., Wollam, A., Panesso, D., Zhou, Y., Rincon, S., Narechania, A., Xing, G., Di Gioia, T. S. R., Doi, A., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1303359 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Bender, R. G., Sirota, S. B., Swetschinski, L. R., Dominguez, R.-M. V., Novotney, A., Wool, E. E., Ikuta, K. S., Vongpradith, A., Rogowski, E. L. B., Doxey, M., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00176-2 · Cited by 596
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria—A Review
Urban-Chmiel, R., Marek, A., Stępień-Pyśniak, D., Wieczorek, K., Dec, M., Nowaczek, A., & Osek, J. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics11081079 · Cited by 580
Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms
Touaitia, R., Mairi, A., Ibrahim, N. A., Basher, N. S., Idres, T., & Touati, A. (2025) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14050470 · Cited by 273
Menz, B. D., Charani, E., Gordon, D. L., Leather, A. J., Moonesinghe, S. R., & Phillips, C. J. (2021) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s319780 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Shariati, A., Dadashi, M., Moghadam, M. T., van Belkum, A., Yaslianifard, S., & Darban-Sarokhalil, D.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2020-07-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12689-12689
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3045967604
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global prevalence and distribution of vancomycin resistant, vancomycin intermediate and heterogeneously vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-020-69058-z
- The paper
- Shariati, A., Dadashi, M., Moghadam, M. T., van Belkum, A., Yaslianifard, S., & Darban-Sarokhalil, D. (2020). Global prevalence and distribution of vancomycin resistant, vancomycin intermediate and heterogeneously vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69058-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.